日用化学工业(中英文) ›› 2023, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (12): 1412-1420.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2097-2806.2023.12.008
收稿日期:
2023-08-26
修回日期:
2023-11-23
出版日期:
2023-12-22
发布日期:
2024-01-12
基金资助:
Xiaoxiao Yang1,Huan Yan2,Yating Yin2,Fan Yi1,*()
Received:
2023-08-26
Revised:
2023-11-23
Online:
2023-12-22
Published:
2024-01-12
Contact:
* Tel.: +86-15652701818, E-mail: 摘要:
油性皮肤的护理是中国年轻女性普遍面临的问题之一。目前,皮肤类型的分析在很大程度上基于主观评估,文献中尚未报道基于无创性皮肤测试设备的油性皮肤分类标准。本研究基于箱形图数据分布和机器学习聚类算法,详细讨论了油性皮肤的无创、客观、定量分类方法,并与皮肤科医生经验值进行互相佐证对比。在此基础上,通过多功能探头测试仪和面部皮肤成像系统定量采集了皮肤屏障、色度、弹性、痤疮等指标数据,分析了油性皮肤的伴随特点和易感皮肤问题,明晰了中国年轻女性油性皮肤的特点,并评估了油性皮肤的痘、敏风险程度。结果显示,基于面部水油分布的箱形图分类法优于本研究中的其他两类方法,油性皮肤的伴随特点为屏障受损、肤色暗沉、弹性较差、痤疮和毛孔多,且痘肌的发生风险在油性皮肤中显著增高。
中图分类号:
杨笑笑, 颜欢, 尹雅婷, 易帆. 中国年轻女性油性皮肤分类方法与特点研究[J]. 日用化学工业(中英文), 2023, 53(12): 1412-1420.
Xiaoxiao Yang, Huan Yan, Yating Yin, Fan Yi. A study on the classification approach and characteristics of oily skin in young Chinese females[J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2023, 53(12): 1412-1420.
表 1
皮肤指标测试仪器及原理"
指标及英文缩写 | 测试设备及规格形号 | 测试原理 |
---|---|---|
皮肤水分含量(CM) | Corneometer CM 825 | 通过CORNEOMETER电容法进行皮肤水分含量的测定 |
经皮水分散失量(TEWL) | Tewamater TM300 | 利用扩散原理来测量邻近皮肤表面水分蒸汽压的变化 |
皮脂分泌量(SM) | Sebumeter SM815 | 通过光度计测定原理SEBUMETER法进行皮脂分泌量的测定 |
皮肤酸碱度(pH) | Skin-pH-Meter PH905 | 通过氢离子(H+)半透膜进行酸碱度pH值的测定 |
黑色素含量(MEXA) 血红素含量(ERYTH) | Mexameter MX18 | 基于RGB光谱吸收原理,通过测定特定波长光的反射量从而进行指标测定 |
肤色(ITA°) | Colorimeter CL400 | 基于CIE L*-a*-b*色度系统测量皮肤颜色的变化 |
皮肤弹性(R2) | Cutometer dual MPA580 | 基于吸力/拉伸原理,通过光学系统测定皮肤被吸进探头内深度反映皮肤弹性 |
色斑(Spots) | — | 基于算法提取VISIA-CR(美国Canfield公司)正面交叉偏振光图片的总色斑个数 |
痤疮(Acne) | — | 基于算法提取VISIA-CR(美国Canfield公司)正面交叉偏振光图片的总痤疮个数 |
毛孔(Pores) | — | 基于算法提取VISIA-CR(美国Canfield公司)正面交叉偏振光图片的总毛孔个数 |
鲍曼问卷分数(BSSQ) | — | 鲍曼问卷中敏感相关部分的量表统计数据,BSSQ≥30被认为是敏感性皮肤 |
表 2
多油人群与总人群的皮肤指标差异"
皮肤参数 | 平均值±标准差 | P值 | |
---|---|---|---|
多油人群 | 总人群 | ||
CM | 55.16±11.13 | 59.49±11.80 | <0.001 |
TEWL | 15.31± 3.92 | 14.94± 4.00 | 0.028 |
L* | 64.67± 2.93 | 65.47± 3.14 | <0.001 |
b* | 11.36± 1.80 | 12.15± 2.20 | <0.001 |
MEXA | 170.72±26.30 | 161.95±27.11 | <0.001 |
ERYTH | 311.35±55.09 | 294.61±56.15 | <0.001 |
R2 | 0.60± 0.09 | 0.64± 0.10 | <0.001 |
Pores | 76.28±39.20 | 63.77±36.57 | <0.001 |
Acne | 18.51±10.44 | 16.17±10.67 | <0.001 |
Spots | 39.62±30.35 | 46.21±33.21 | <0.001 |
BSSQ | 29.89± 7.52 | 29.24± 6.41 | 0.428 |
表 3
油性皮肤与中性皮肤的描述性统计及差异性分析"
皮肤参数 | 平均值±标准差 | P值 | |
---|---|---|---|
油性皮肤 | 中性皮肤 | ||
CM | 61.07± 6.75 | 65.57± 8.27 | <0.001 |
SM | 134.59±36.53 | 54.00±21.74 | <0.001 |
TEWL | 14.67± 3.06 | 14.17± 3.55 | 0.002 |
pH | 5.51± 0.49 | 5.45± 0.49 | 0.054 |
MEXA | 170.15±24.62 | 158.81±26.49 | <0.001 |
ERYTH | 310.15±57.29 | 287.77±55.42 | <0.001 |
L* | 63.99± 2.18 | 64.57± 1.89 | 0.001 |
b* | 11.35± 1.80 | 12.37± 2.33 | <0.001 |
R2 | 0.61± 0.08 | 0.66± 0.10 | <0.001 |
Pore | 75.45±40.87 | 58.50±34.25 | <0.001 |
Acne | 17.59± 9.63 | 15.50±10.45 | <0.001 |
Spots | 39.15±25.38 | 47.53±30.78 | <0.001 |
BSSQ | 30.03± 7.72 | 29.29± 6.09 | 0.573 |
表 4
油性皮肤的痘、敏风险优势比"
分类方法 | 肤质 | 痘肌 | 非痘肌 | OR (95% CI) | 敏感肌 | 非敏感肌 | OR (95% CI) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
箱型图 | 油性 | 36 | 298 | 1.503 (1.011~2.232)* | 150 | 184 | 1.223 (0.963~1.553) | |
混合性 | 24 | 137 | 2.179 (1.356~3.502)* | 67 | 94 | 1.069 (0.769~1.487) | ||
其他 | 112 | 1 393 | 1 | 602 | 903 | 1 | ||
聚类 | 油性 | 60 | 435 | 1.716 (1.231~2.390)* | 217 | 278 | 1.171 (0.954~1.438) | |
非油性 | 112 | 1 393 | 1 | 602 | 903 | 1 | ||
经验值 | 油性 | 51 | 396 | 1.524 (1.079~2.153)* | 209 | 238 | 1.358 (1.098~1.678)* | |
非油性 | 121 | 1 432 | 1 | 610 | 943 | 1 |
[1] |
Niemann C, Horsley V. Development and homeostasis of the sebaceous gland[J]. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol., 2012, 23 (8) : 928-936.
doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2012.08.010 pmid: 22960253 |
[2] |
Sakuma T H, Maibach H I. Oily skin: an overview[J]. Skin Pharmacol. Physiol., 2012, 25 (5) : 227-235.
doi: 10.1159/000338978 |
[3] |
Zheng Y, Liang H, Zhou M, et al. Skin bacterial structure of young females in China: the relationship between skin bacterial structure and facial skin types[J]. Exp. Dermatol., 2021, 30 (10) : 1366-1374.
doi: 10.1111/exd.v30.10 |
[4] |
Jang S I, Jung Y, Lee M, et al. Evaluation of changes in skin characteristics due to the poor quality of sleep caused by smartphone usage[J]. J. Cosmet. Dermatol., 2022, 21 (4) : 1656-1665.
doi: 10.1111/jocd.v21.4 |
[5] |
Zhao C, Wang X, Mao Y, et al. Variation of biophysical parameters of the skin with age, gender, and lifestyles[J]. J. Cosmet. Dermatol., 2021, 20 (1) : 249-255.
doi: 10.1111/jocd.v20.1 |
[6] |
Jang S I, Han J, Lee M, et al. A study of skin characteristics according to humidity during sleep[J]. Skin Res. Technol., 2019, 25 (4) : 456-460.
doi: 10.1111/srt.12673 pmid: 30620080 |
[7] |
Kim S, Park J W, Yeon Y, et al. Influence of exposure to summer environments on skin properties[J]. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol., 2019, 33 (11) : 2192-2196.
doi: 10.1111/jdv.15745 pmid: 31199529 |
[8] |
Jacobsen E, Billings J K, Frantz R A, et al. Age-related changes in sebaceous wax ester secretion rates in men and women[J]. J. Invest. Dermatol., 1985, 85 (5) : 483-485.
pmid: 4056460 |
[9] |
Rawlings A V. Ethnic skin types: are there differences in skin structure and function?[J]. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci., 2006, 28 (2) : 79-93.
doi: 10.1111/ics.2006.28.issue-2 |
[10] |
Galzote C, Estanislao R, Suero M O, et al. Characterization of facial skin of various Asian populations through visual and non-invasive instrumental evaluations: influence of age and skincare habits[J]. Skin Res. Technol., 2013, 19 (4) : 454-465.
doi: 10.1111/srt.12069 pmid: 23521621 |
[11] |
Zhao C, Wang X, Mao Y, et al. Variation of biophysical parameters of the skin with age, gender, and lifestyles[J]. J. Cosmet. Dermatol., 2021, 20 (1) : 249-255.
doi: 10.1111/jocd.v20.1 |
[12] |
Nouveau-Richard S, Zhu W, Li Y H, et al. Oily skin: specific features in Chinese women[J]. Skin Res. Technol., 2007, 13 (1) : 43-48.
pmid: 17250531 |
[13] |
Seo J I, Ham H I, Baek J H, et al. An objective skin-type classification based on non-invasive biophysical parameters[J]. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol., 2022, 36 (3) : 444-452.
doi: 10.1111/jdv.v36.3 |
[14] | Du Shuangyu, Wang Hongbin, Li Feng. Identification method of transformer oil temperature abnormal state[J]. Elect. Appl., 2015, 34 (S2) : 859-862. |
[15] | Wang Yu, Zhou Yongzhang, Xiao Fan, et al. Theoretical basis of box diagram and its application in earth science research[C]// Abstracted Proceedings of the 8th National Symposium on the Theory of Mineralization and Methods of Finding Minerals. Nanchang: Editorial Department of Acta Mineralogica Sinica, 2017: 752. |
[16] | Liang Huixiang, Jing Jianping, Abduzhixiti-Buimaiti, et al. Classification and evaluation of cotton quality in Xinjiang based on cluster analysis and discriminant analysis[J]. Wool Text. Sci. Technol., 2023, 51 (5) : 121-126. |
[17] | Jing Liu, Ziyin Qiu, Maozu Guo, et al. An improved algorithm for K-means clustering based on Tukey’s rule and initial centroid optimization[J]. Data Acquis. Process., 2023, 38 (3) : 643-651. |
[18] |
Mercurio D G, Segura J H, Demets M B, et al. Clinical scoring and instrumental analysis to evaluate skin types[J]. Clin. Exp. Dermatol., 2013, 38 (3) : 302-308.
doi: 10.1111/ced.12105 pmid: 23517362 |
[19] |
Tangkijngamvong N, Phaiyarin P, Wanichwecharungruang S, et al. The anti-sebum property of chitosan particles[J]. J. Cosmet. Dermatol., 2020, 19 (8) : 2135-2140.
doi: 10.1111/jocd.v19.8 |
[20] |
Theerawattanawit C, Phaiyarin P, Wanichwecharungruang S, et al. The efficacy and safety of chitosan on facial skin sebum[J]. Skin Pharmacol. Physiol., 2022, 35 (1) : 23-30.
doi: 10.1159/000517965 |
[21] | Chen Fan, Yang Jun, Yang Suping, et al. Study on the anti-acne efficacy of hydrolyzed zinc hyaluronate[J]. Dail. Chem. Ind., 2023, 53 (2) : 165-170. |
[22] |
Jo D J, Shin J Y, Na S J. Evaluation of changes for sebum, skin pore, texture, and redness before and after sleep in oily and nonoily skin[J]. Skin Res. Technol., 2022, 28 (6) : 851-855.
doi: 10.1111/srt.13224 pmid: 36308509 |
[23] |
Maia C P, Melo M O, Mercurio D G. Use of advanced imaging techniques for the characterization of oily skin[J]. Front. Physiol., 2019, 10: 254.
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00254 pmid: 30971936 |
[24] |
Kim B Y, Choi J W, Park K C, et al. Sebum, acne, skin elasticity, and gender difference-which is the major influencing factor for facial pores?[J]. Skin Res. Technol., 2013, 19 (1) : 45-53.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2011.00605.x pmid: 22211382 |
[25] |
Hameed A, Akhtar N, Khan H M S, et al. Skin sebum and skin elasticity: Major influencing factors for facial pores[J]. J. Cosmet. Dermatol., 2019, 18 (6) : 1968-1974.
doi: 10.1111/jocd.v18.6 |
[26] |
Lee S J, Seok J, Jeong S Y, et al. Facial pores: definition, causes, and treatment options[J]. Dermatol. Surg., 2016, 42 (3) : 277-285.
doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000657 pmid: 26918966 |
[27] |
Jung Y C, Kim E J, Cho J C, et al. Effect of skin pH for wrinkle formation on Asian: Korean, Vietnamese and Singaporean[J]. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol., 2013, 27 (3) : 328-332.
doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2012.04660.x pmid: 22830637 |
[28] |
Kim M K, Choi S Y, Byun H J, et al. Comparison of sebum secretion, skin type, pH in humans with and without acne[J]. Arch. Dermatol. Res., 2006, 298 (3) : 113-119.
doi: 10.1007/s00403-006-0666-0 |
[29] |
Blaak J, Staib P. The relation of pH and skin cleansing[J]. Curr. Probl. Dermatol., 2018, 54: 132-142.
doi: 10.1159/000489527 pmid: 30130782 |
[30] |
Cunliffe W J, Burton J L, Shuster S. The effect of local temperature variations on the sebum excretion rate[J]. Br. J. Dermatol., 1970, 83 (6) : 650-654.
doi: 10.1111/bjd.1970.83.issue-6 |
[31] | He Li, Zheng J, Ma Huiqun, et al. Expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of sensitive skin in China[J]. Chin. J. Dermatol. Venereol., 2017, 31 (1) : 1-4. |
[32] |
Baumann L. Understanding and treating various skin types: the Baumann skin type indicator[J]. Dermatol. Clin., 2008, 26 (3) : 359-373.
doi: 10.1016/j.det.2008.03.007 pmid: 18555952 |
[33] | Ju Qiang. Chinese acne treatment guidelines (2019 revised edition)[J]. J. Clin. Dermatol., 2019, 48 (9) : 583-588. |
[34] |
Pochi P E, Shalita A R, Strauss J S, et al. Report of the consensus conference on acne classification. Washington, D.C., March 24 and 25, 1990[J]. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 1991, 24 (3) : 495-500.
doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(08)80076-x pmid: 1829466 |
[35] |
Yang J, Yang H, Xu A, et al. A review of advancement on influencing factors of acne: an emphasis on environment characteristics[J]. Front. Public Health, 2020, 8: 450.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00450 pmid: 33042936 |
[1] | 柳婧璇, 金建明, 吴华. 化妆品植物原料(Ⅶ)——抗真菌的植物原料的研究与开发[J]. 日用化学工业(中英文), 2024, 54(3): 259-266. |
[2] | 胡翠翠, 周代红, 陈欣菀, 钟佳伶, 茆灿泉. 中药复方MHC-20的抗化脓性链球菌功效与作用机制探究[J]. 日用化学工业(中英文), 2024, 54(3): 282-289. |
[3] | 毕武, 潘小红, 涂晓琴, 殷帅, 孙辉. 基于网络药理学的化妆品原料粉防己抗敏作用机制分析[J]. 日用化学工业(中英文), 2024, 54(3): 305-312. |
[4] | 李瑶瑶. 异橙黄酮的抗衰老及抗氧化功效研究[J]. 日用化学工业(中英文), 2024, 54(3): 313-319. |
[5] | 张婉萍, 彭祺, 张冬梅, 郑时莲, 蒋汶, 顾理浩. 4-取代酚诱导化学性白斑的机制及研究进展[J]. 日用化学工业(中英文), 2024, 54(3): 320-328. |
[6] | 许梦然, 赵华. 化妆品晒后修护功效评价方法研究进展[J]. 日用化学工业(中英文), 2024, 54(3): 329-336. |
[7] | 塔娜, 冯孟鑫, 高家敏, 张凤兰, 王钢力. 潜在内分泌干扰风险防晒剂的监管及其使用情况分析[J]. 日用化学工业(中英文), 2024, 54(3): 337-343. |
[8] | 周文瑞, 贺建彪, 焦倩, 王紫迪, 苏芊芊, 贾焱. O/W乳化体系化妆品感官评价与仪器分析相关性研究进展[J]. 日用化学工业(中英文), 2024, 54(3): 344-352. |
[9] | 张丽媛, 颜琳琦, 程巧鸳, 戚绿叶, 王容, 黄柳倩. 高效液相色谱法测定化妆品中14种α-羟基酸和羟基酸酯[J]. 日用化学工业(中英文), 2024, 54(3): 353-359. |
[10] | 徐炜, 邹坡, 李长于, 杨铭, 鹿燕, 李慧良. 超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定化妆品中36种兴奋剂[J]. 日用化学工业(中英文), 2024, 54(3): 360-368. |
[11] | 周康夫, 支奕轩, 王飞飞, 尚亚卓. 新型乳化体系及其在化妆品中的应用(Ⅵ)——微乳液[J]. 日用化学工业(中英文), 2024, 54(2): 139-148. |
[12] | 张红菱, 程琳, 王海燕, 罗飞亚, 张会亮, 孙磊. 应用DPRA替代方法评价3种香豆素类化合物的皮肤致敏性[J]. 日用化学工业(中英文), 2024, 54(2): 156-160. |
[13] | 谢珍, 黄微, 张劲松, 陈舒怀, 瞿霖吉, 匡荣. 化妆品眼刺激性评价中角膜损伤生物标志物研究[J]. 日用化学工业(中英文), 2024, 54(2): 161-167. |
[14] | 李慧怡, 周悦, 吴谦, 杜丽镝, 谢嘉颖, 谭建华. 化妆品防晒黑功效评价方法研究[J]. 日用化学工业(中英文), 2024, 54(2): 168-174. |
[15] | 彭心宇, 梁海燕, 温紫娴, 李美停, 李鑫, 邱晓锋. 流变调节剂在二元喷雾产品中的影响[J]. 日用化学工业(中英文), 2024, 54(2): 181-187. |
|