化妆品乳液及乳化新技术（Ⅵ）——液体弹珠与化妆品

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1803.2021.12.002

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

液体弹珠是一种由疏液固体颗粒在液滴表面形成吸附层而兼具液体和固体性质的特殊软物质。虽然结构简单,但是这种新型软物质呈现出众多独特的物理化学性质,使其在许多不同的领域都展现出良好的应用前景,特别是在化妆品领域,应该是最有前景和最具可行性的。然而,液体弹珠在目前的使用过程中仍然存在一些缺点,例如,内部液滴挥发速度快和外壳机械强度不可控。本文首先回顾液体弹珠的制备方法、形成原理和使用材料,进而论述液体弹珠的物理化学性质,主要针对液体弹珠内部液滴的挥发速度和外壳的机械强度,最后概述液体弹珠在化妆品领域的应用现状和存在的挑战。

关键词: 液体弹珠, 化妆品, 软物质

Abstract:

Liquid marbles are a type of unusual soft matter that combines properties of liquid and solid by producing a lyophobic adsorbed layer of solid particles on the surface of liquid droplets. Despite the simple structure thereof, this novel soft matter has numerous unique physical and chemical properties, making it promising in a wide range of applications, particularly in cosmetics, which should be the most promising and feasible. However, there are still some disadvantages to using liquid marbles, e.g., quick evaporation of the interior droplet and uncontrollable mechanical strength of the outer shell. Herein, the preparation methods, formation mechanism and material selection have been reviewed, followed by a discussion of the physical and chemical properties of liquid marbles, with a focus on the evaporation rate of the interior droplet and the mechanical strength of the outer shell. Finally, the current state of application and the challenges of liquid marbles in cosmetics have been summarized.

Key words: liquid marble, cosmetics, soft matter

中图分类号:

TQ658

陈凤凤,龚穗菁,陈文静,孙亚娟,杨成,李云兴. 化妆品乳液及乳化新技术（Ⅵ）——液体弹珠与化妆品[J]. 日用化学工业, 2021, 51(12): 1171-1178.

Chen Fengfeng,Gong Suijing,Chen Wenjing,Sun Yajuan,Yang Cheng,Li Yunxing. Cosmetic emulsions and new technologies of emulsification (Ⅵ) Liquid marbles and cosmetics[J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2021, 51(12): 1171-1178.

图/表 5

图 1

图 2

图 3

图 4

图 5

参考文献 50

[1]	Leal-Calderon F, Schmitt V. Solid-stabilized emulsions[J]. Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science, 2008, 13(4) : 217-227. doi: 10.1016/j.cocis.2007.09.005
[2]	Aussillous P, Quéré D. Liquid marbles[J]. Nature, 2001, 411(6840) : 924-927. doi: 10.1038/35082026
[3]	McHale G, Newton M I. Liquid marbles: principles and applications[J]. Soft Matter, 2011, 7(12) : 5473-5481. doi: 10.1039/c1sm05066d
[4]	Allan, Barry D. Dry Water: US4008170[P]. 1977.
[5]	Dieter S, Franz-Theo S, Helmut B. Predominantly aqueous compositions in a fluffy powdery form approximating powdered solids behavior and process for forming same: US3393155[P]. 1968.
[6]	Bormashenko E, Bormashenko Y, Grynyov R, et al. Self-propulsion of liquid marbles: leidenfrost-like levitation driven by marangoni flow[J]. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2015, 119(18) : 9910-9915. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b01307
[7]	Saczek J, Yao X, Zivkovic V, et al. Long-lived liquid marbles for green applications[J]. Advanced Functional Materials, 2021, 31(35) : 2011198. doi: 10.1002/adfm.v31.35
[8]	Gallo A, Tavares F, Das R, et al. How particle-particle and liquid-particle interactions govern the fate of evaporating liquid marbles[J]. Soft Matter, 2021, 17(33) : 7628-7644. doi: 10.1039/D1SM00750E
[9]	Tenjimbayashi M, Fujii S. How liquid marbles break down: direct evidence for two breakage scenarios[J]. Small, 2021, 17(37) : 2102438. doi: 10.1002/smll.v17.37
[10]	Yue S, Shen W, Hapgood K. Characterisation of liquid marbles in commercial cosmetic products[J]. Advanced Powder Technology, 2016, 27(1) : 33-41. doi: 10.1016/j.apt.2015.10.014
[11]	Aussillous P, Quéré D. Properties of liquid marbles[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2006, 462(2067) : 973-999. doi: 10.1098/rspa.2005.1581
[12]	Levine S, Bowen B D, Partridge S J. Stabilization of emulsions by fine particles i. partitioning of particles between continuous phase and oil/water interface[J]. Colloids and Surfaces, 1989, 38(2) : 325-343. doi: 10.1016/0166-6622(89)80271-9
[13]	Levine S, Bowen B D. Capillary interaction of spherical particles adsorbed on the surface of an oil/water droplet stabilized by the particles: 3. effective interfacial tension[J]. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 1993, 70(1) : 33-45. doi: 10.1016/0927-7757(93)80494-Y
[14]	McEleney P, Walker G M, Larmour I A, et al. Liquid marble formation using hydrophobic powders[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2009, 147(2/3) : 373-382. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2008.11.026
[15]	Nguyen T H, Hapgood K, Shen W. Observation of the liquid marble morphology using confocal microscopy[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2010, 162(1) : 396-405. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2010.05.038
[16]	Fernandes A M, Mantione D, Gracia R, et al. From polymer latexes to multifunctional liquid marbles[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2015, 7(7) : 4433-4441.
[17]	Tosun A, Erbil H Y. Evaporation rate of ptfe liquid marbles[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2009, 256(5) : 1278-1283. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.10.035
[18]	Li X, Xue Y, Lv P, et al. Liquid plasticine: controlled deformation and recovery of droplets with interfacial nanoparticle jamming[J]. Soft Matter, 2016, 12(6) : 1655-1662. doi: 10.1039/C5SM02765A
[19]	Shi H, Li X. Monolayer nanoparticle‐covered liquid marble production with low surface tension liquids[J]. Advanced Materials Interfaces, 2020, 7(21) : 2001081. doi: 10.1002/admi.v7.21
[20]	Huang J, Wang Z, Shi H, et al. Mechanical robustness of monolayer nanoparticle-covered liquid marbles[J]. Soft Matter, 2020, 16(19) : 4632-4639. doi: 10.1039/D0SM00496K
[21]	McHale G, Shirtcliffe N J, Newton M I, et al. Self-organization of hydrophobic soil and granular surfaces[J]. Applied Physics Letters, 2007, 90(5) : 054110. doi: 10.1063/1.2435594
[22]	Eshtiaghi N, Liu J S, Shen W, et al. Liquid marble formation: spreading coefficients or kinetic energy?[J]. Powder Technology, 2009, 196(2) : 126-132. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2009.07.002
[23]	Marston J O, Zhu Y, Vakarelski I U, et al. Deformed liquid marbles: freezing drop oscillations with powders[J]. Powder Technology, 2012, 228:424-428. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2012.06.003
[24]	Supakar T, Moradiafrapoli M, Christopher G F, et al. Spreading, encapsulation and transition to arrested shapes during drop impact onto hydrophobic powders[J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2016, 468:10-20. doi: S0021-9797(16)30028-5 pmid: 26821147
[25]	Liyanaarachchi K R, Ireland P M, Webber G B, et al. Electrostatic formation of liquid marbles and agglomerates[J]. Applied Physics Letters, 2013, 103(5) : 054105. doi: 10.1063/1.4817586
[26]	Luo X J, Zhang X, Feng Y J. Liquid marbles: fabrication, physical properties, and applications[J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2020, 36(10) : 1910007.
[27]	Thomas C A, Munday H, Lobel B T, et al. Exploring the impact of particle material properties on electrostatic liquid marble formation[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2020, 124(48) : 26258-26267. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c07625
[28]	Bormashenko E. Liquid marbles: properties and applications[J]. Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science, 2011, 16(4) : 266-271. doi: 10.1016/j.cocis.2010.12.002
[29]	Oliveira N M, Reis R L, Mano J F. The potential of liquid marbles for biomedical applications: a critical review[J]. Advanced Healthcare Materials, 2017, 6(19) : 1700192. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201700192
[30]	Xue Y, Wang H, Zhao Y, et al. Magnetic liquid marbles: a “precise” miniature reactor[J]. Advanced Materials, 2010, 22(43) : 4814-4818. doi: 10.1002/adma.201001898
[31]	Binks B P, Tyowua A T. Influence of the degree of fluorination on the behaviour of silica particles at air-oil surfaces[J]. Soft Matter, 2013, 9(3) : 834-845. doi: 10.1039/C2SM27395K
[32]	Sheng Y, Sun G, Wu J, et al. Silica-based liquid marbles as microreactors for the silver mirror reaction[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2015, 54(24) : 7012-7017. doi: 10.1002/anie.201500010
[33]	Li X G, Shi H X, Hu Y Y. Rod-shaped liquid plasticine for gas diffusion detection[J]. Soft Matter, 2019, 15(15) : 3085-3088. doi: 10.1039/C9SM00362B
[34]	Arbatan T, Al-Abboodi A, Sarvi F, et al. Tumor inside a pearl drop[J]. Advanced Healthcare Materials, 2012, 1(4) : 467-469. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201200050 pmid: 23184778
[35]	Oliveira N M, Correia C R, Reis R L, et al. Liquid marbles for high-throughput biological screening of anchorage-dependent cells[J]. Advanced Healthcare Materials, 2015, 4(2) : 264-270. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201400310 pmid: 25091700
[36]	Avramescu R E, Ghica M V, Dinu-Pirvu C, et al. Liquid marbles: from industrial to medical applications[J]. Molecules, 2018, 23(5) : 1120. doi: 10.3390/molecules23051120
[37]	Dandan M, Erbil H Y. Evaporation rate of graphite liquid marbles: comparison with water droplets[J]. Langmuir, 2009, 25(14) : 8362-8367. doi: 10.1021/la900729d pmid: 19499944
[38]	Cengiz U, Erbil H Y. The lifetime of floating liquid marbles: the influence of particle size and effective surface tension[J]. Soft Matter, 2013, 9(37) : 8980. doi: 10.1039/c3sm51304a
[39]	Laborie B, Lachaussée F, Lorenceau E, et al. How coatings with hydrophobic particles may change the drying of water droplets: incompressible surface versus porous media effects[J]. Soft Matter, 2013, 9(19) : 8980-8991. doi: 10.1039/c3sm51304a
[40]	Bhosale P S, Panchagnula M V, Stretz H A. Mechanically robust nanoparticle stabilized transparent liquid marbles[J]. Applied Physics Letters, 2008, 93(3) : 034109. doi: 10.1063/1.2959853
[41]	Roy P K, Binks B P, Bormashenko E, et al. Manufacture and properties of composite liquid marbles[J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2020, 575:35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2020.04.066
[42]	Binks B P, Johnston S K, Sekine T, et al. Particles at oil-air surfaces: powdered oil, liquid oil marbles, and oil foam[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2015, 7(26) : 14328-14337.
[43]	Liu Z, Fu X, Binks B P, et al. Mechanical compression to characterize the robustness of liquid marbles[J]. Langmuir, 2015, 31(41) : 11236-11242. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b02792
[44]	McHale G, Newton M I. Liquid Marbles: Topical context within soft matter and recent progress[J]. Soft Matter, 2015, 11(13) : 2530-2546. doi: 10.1039/c5sm00084j pmid: 25723648
[45]	Zang D, Chen Z, Zhang Y, et al. Effect of particle hydrophobicity on the properties of liquid water marbles[J]. Soft Matter, 2013, 9(20) : 5067-5073. doi: 10.1039/c3sm50421b
[46]	Zhou X, Lin X, White K L, et al. Effect of the degree of substitution on the hydrophobicity of acetylated cellulose for production of liquid marbles[J]. Cellulose, 2016, 23(1) : 811-821. doi: 10.1007/s10570-015-0856-z
[47]	Azizian S, Fujii S, Kasahara M, et al. Effect of particle morphology on mechanical properties of liquid marbles[J]. Advanced Powder Technology, 2019, 30(2) : 330-335. doi: 10.1016/j.apt.2018.11.010
[48]	Forny L, Pezron I, Saleh K, et al. Storing water in powder form by self-assembling hydrophobic silica nanoparticles[J]. Powder Technology, 2007, 171(1) : 15-24. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2006.09.006
[49]	Liu Z, Zhang Y, Chen C, et al. Larger stabilizing particles make stronger liquid marble[J]. Small, 2019, 15(3) : 1804549.
[50]	Asaumi Y, Rey M, Oyama K, et al. Effect of stabilizing particle size on the structure and properties of liquid marbles[J]. Langmuir, 2020, 36(44) : 13274-13284. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c02265