欢迎访问《日用化学工业(中英文)》,今天是

日用化学工业 ›› 2021, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (3): 243-249.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1803.2021.03.012

• 专论与综述 • 上一篇    下一篇

化妆品防腐体系效能测试方法的比较与选择

罗俊(),王晓炜,刘奕,周海穆,应国红()   

  1. 深圳市药品检验研究院 国家药品监督管理局化妆品监测评价重点实验室,广东 深圳 518057
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-10 修回日期:2021-02-25 出版日期:2021-03-22 发布日期:2021-03-23
  • 通讯作者: 应国红
  • 作者简介:罗 俊(1986-),男,主管药师,硕士,主要从事化妆品微生物学检验质量标准研究,电话:(0755)26609844,E-mail:ljrobby@126.com

Comparison and selection of effectiveness test methods of cosmetic antiseptic system

LUO Jun(),WANG Xiao-wei,LIU Yi,ZHOU Hai-mu,YING Guo-hong()   

  1. NMPA Key Laboratory for Monitoring and Evaluation of Cosmetics, Shenzhen Institute for Drug Control, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518057, China
  • Received:2020-05-10 Revised:2021-02-25 Online:2021-03-22 Published:2021-03-23
  • Contact: Guo-hong YING

摘要:

介绍了化妆品防腐体系效能测试方法的研究现状,对化妆品和香料香精协会(Cosmetic,Toiletry and Fragrance Association,CTFA)、美国材料试验协会(American Society for Testing and Materials,ASTM)、国际标准化组织(International Organization for Standardization,ISO)、美国药典(United States Pharmacopeia,USP)、欧洲药典(European Pharmacopeia,EP)以及中国药典(Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China,ChP)的相关标准进行了比较和分析,为化妆品企业科学地选择防腐体系效能测试方法提供参考。

关键词: 化妆品, 效能测试, 微生物挑战试验

Abstract:

The research progress of effectiveness test methods of cosmetic antiseptic system were introduced, and the related standards of cosmetic were analyzed and compared, including Toiletry and Fragrance Association (CTFA) , American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), International Organization for Standardization (ISO) , United States Pharmacopeia (USP), European Pharmacopeia (EP) and Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China (ChP), and it provided a reference for cosmetics enterprises to select the method of preservation test scientifically.

Key words: cosmetic, preservation test, microbial challenge test

中图分类号: 

  • TQ658