日用化学工业(中英文) ›› 2024, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (7): 803-811.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2097-2806.2024.07.007
彭常梅1,3,冯洁2,姚天波2,张婉萍1,3,郑时莲1,3,*()
收稿日期:
2023-08-02
修回日期:
2024-06-25
出版日期:
2024-07-22
发布日期:
2024-07-26
基金资助:
Changmei Peng1,3,Jie Feng2,Tianbo Yao2,Wanping Zhang1,3,Shilian Zheng1,3,*()
Received:
2023-08-02
Revised:
2024-06-25
Online:
2024-07-22
Published:
2024-07-26
Contact:
*E-mail: zhengshilian07@163.com.
摘要:
通过考察不同地区、不同年龄和不同性别受试者唇部皮肤基础状态,进行唇部生理参数的多维度分析和研究,并通过唇油对唇部皮肤的干预,来探究影响唇部皮肤性状的主要因素。用无创性评价方法测定了华东地区(73名)和华北地区(50名)受试者(18~35岁73名,35~60岁50名;男性55名,女性68名)唇部下唇的水分含量、TEWL、光泽度、弹性、L*a*b*值和纹理8个皮肤生理参数。研究结果表明,华东地区组受试者唇部基础状态的经皮水分散失(Trans Epidermal Water Loss,TEWL)值(51.99±17.37)、L*值(51.99±8.83)、b*值(15.40±1.56)和纹理值(15.10±6.43)分别显著高于华北地区组(P<0.05)。35~60岁组受试者唇部基础状态的水分含量(56.82±12.63)和皮肤弹性(0.78±0.18)显著高于18~35岁组(P<0.05)。男性组唇部基础状态的TEWL值(52.08±17.68)显著高于女性组(43.48±16.03)(P<0.05)。通过唇油对唇部皮肤的干预,与基础状态相比,受试者使用唇油后其唇部水分含量均是先降低后逐渐升高;TEWL值先显著性降低后逐渐增加;光泽度、弹性和纹理均是先增加后减小;皮肤色泽(L*a*b*值)的变化不显著。由此可知,受试者唇部皮肤生理参数不仅受到地区、年龄以及性别的影响,还与受试者唇部基础状态及唇部产品的使用频率等因素相关。
中图分类号:
彭常梅, 冯洁, 姚天波, 张婉萍, 郑时莲. 唇部皮肤生理参数的多维度分析和研究[J]. 日用化学工业(中英文), 2024, 54(7): 803-811.
Changmei Peng, Jie Feng, Tianbo Yao, Wanping Zhang, Shilian Zheng. Multidimensional analysis and study of physiological parameters of lip skin[J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2024, 54(7): 803-811.
表2
受试者唇部状态调查表"
序号 | 调查项目 | 分布情况 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 研究对象 | 学生:57人;上班族:66人 | |||
2 | 唇部皮肤 特点 | 干:上海(16人),18~35岁(9人);北京(7人),35~60岁(5人) | 很干:上海(7人),18~35岁(6人);北京(8人),18~35岁(5人) | 较干:上海(43人),18~35岁(31人);北京(35人),35~60岁(20人) | 湿润:上海(6人),18~35岁(4人);北京(1人),35~60岁(1人) |
3 | 是否使用唇部产品 | 是:101人 上海(61人),18~35岁(39人); 北京(40人),35~60岁(22人) | 否:22人 上海(12人),18~35岁(11人); 北京(10人),35~60岁(4人) | ||
4 | 使用唇部产品的频率 | 感觉干了就涂:51人 上海(25人),18~35岁(16人); 北京(26人),35~60岁(13人) | 每天:33人 上海(19人),18~35岁(12人); 北京(13人),35~60岁(7人) | 想涂就涂:39人 上海(28人),18~35岁(22人); 北京(11人),35~60岁(6人) |
图2
18~35岁组和35~60岁组受试者使用唇油后对唇部皮肤生理参数的影响:A:皮肤含水量;B:TEWL;C:光泽度;D:弹性(R2);E:L*值;F:a*值;G:b*值;H:纹理值(显著性标注方法:1. 唇部基础状态功效评价参数:18~35岁组与35~60岁组相比,“&”表示有显著性差异,0.01≤P<0.05;“&&”表示有显著性差异,0.001≤P<0.01;“&&&&”表示有显著性差异,P<0.000 1;2. 两个年龄段受试者使用唇油后与初始状态相比:“*”表示有显著性差异,0.01≤P<0.05;“**”表示有显著性差异,0.001≤P<0.01;“***”表示有显著性差异,P<0.001;“****”表示有显著性差异,P<0.000 1;“—”代表显著性相同)"
[1] | Ye Congxiu, Lai Wei, Yi Jinling, et al. Investigate the methods appraising the labial part moisturizing effect of lipstick cosmetics[J]. Chinese Journal of Aesthetic Medicine, 2010, 19 (1) : 7577. |
[2] | Li Haijun, Weng Minjie, Duan Wanqi, et al. The study progress of the morphological variation of human orolabial region[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2023, 42 (1) : 137-148. |
[3] |
Kim H, Lee M, Park S Y, et al. Age-related changes in lip morphological and physiological characteristics in Korean women[J]. Skin Research and Technology, 2019, 25 (3) : 277-282.
doi: 10.1111/srt.12644 pmid: 30358914 |
[4] | Sforza C, Grandi G, Binelli M, et al. Age-and sex-related changes in three-dimensional lip morphology[J]. Forensic Science International, 2010, 200 (1-3) : 182. e1-182.e7. |
[5] | Ruan Jing, Wang Xuemin. The analysis of lip texture at different age group[J]. Journal of Clinical Dermatology, 2011, 40 (12) : 715-718. |
[6] | Rayner C R, Fogel M L, Stranc M F. Lip function: A study of normal lip parameters[J]. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1987, 79 (4) : 674. |
[7] | Jia Xueting, Zhang Yue, Li Jingjing, et al. A study on the lip and perioral aging via fast optical in vivo topometry of human skin[J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2022, 52 (7) : 750-755. |
[8] | Yu Hui, Li Qiong, Zhang Wanping, et al. Effect of three kinds of humectant on skin performance[J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2013, 43 (2) : 139-143. |
[9] | Wan Jinjin, Liu Ruixue, Leng Qunying, et al. Preparation and efficacy evaluation of a human skin whitening cream[J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2017, 47( 9): 512-516, 521. |
[10] | Cheng Fang, Gao Jinping, Yang Sen, et al. Age-related and regional changes in skin elasticity: a quantitative evaluation of Han subjects[J]. Chinese Journal of Aesthetic Medicine, 2017, 26 (2) : 61-64. |
[11] | Liu Kexuan. The consumption market survey report of 18-22 years old unmarried female lip balm[J]. Guangxi Quality Supervision Guide, 2019 (5) : 231. |
[12] | Li Wenzhao, Jiang Qing, Tang Lirong. Study on the correlation between cosmetic moisturizing and skin texture[J]. Detergent & Cosmetics, 2022, 45 (1) : 27-31. |
[13] | Wang Chunxiao, Zhao Hua. Efficacy evaluation of cosmetics (Ⅱ): Scientific support for moisturizing cosmetic efficacy claims[J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2018, 48 (2) : 67-72. |
[14] | Cheng Fang. Age-related and regional changes in skin elasticity: a quantitative evaluation of Han subjects[D]. Hefei: Anhui Medical University, 2017. |
[15] | Li Chengtong, Zhao Hua. Efficacy evaluation of cosmetics(Ⅳ): Scientific support for delaying skin aging cosmetic efficacy claims[J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2018, 48 (4) : 188-195. |
[16] | Wang Huan, Pan Yao. Efficacy evaluation of cosmetics(V): Scientific support for soothing skin emcacy claims[J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2018, 48 (5) : 247-254. |
[17] | Cui Huanlian, Liu Xiaoying, Luo Yanlin, et al. Relationship between skin color and age of people in the three regions of China[J]. The Chinese Journal of Dermatovenereology, 2013, 27 (2) : 204-207. |
[18] |
Tamura E, Ishikawa J, Sugata K, et al. Age-related differences in the functional properties of lips compared with skin[J]. Skin Research and Technology, 2018, 24 (3) : 472-478.
doi: 10.1111/srt.12456 pmid: 29405429 |
[19] | Ao Huaying, Cheng Shujun. Uncovering the safety evaluation techniques of cosmetics (5) : Skin absorption and test methods of cosmetics[J]. China Cosmetics Review, 2011 (5) : 57-61. |
[20] | Yang Huimin, Feng Di. A review of research on efficacy evaluation of cosmetics[J]. Detergent & Cosmetics, 2016, 39 (11) : 26-31. |
[21] | Zhao Hua, Wang Nan. Efficacy evaluation of cosmetics(Ⅲ): Scientific supports for whitening cosmetic emcacy claims[J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2018, 48 (3) : 129-133, 139. |
[22] |
Fink B, Matts P J. The effects of skin colour distribution and topography cues on the perception of female facial age and health[J]. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 2008, 22 (4) : 493-498.
doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2007.02512.x pmid: 18081752 |
[23] | Ferrario V F, Sforza C, Serrao G. A three-dimensional quantitative analysis of lips in normal young adults[J]. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 2000, 37 (1) : 48-54. |
[24] |
Stephen I D, McKeegan A M. Lip colour affects perceived sex typicality and attractiveness of human faces[J]. Perception, 2010, 39 (8) : 1104-1110.
pmid: 20942361 |
[1] | 江月明,鲁文嘉,瞿欣. 檀香木提取物对皮肤嗅觉受体的影响及功效[J]. 日用化学工业(中英文), 2024, 54(7): 828-835. |
[2] | 邵冠儒, 张坤阳. 大黄酸通过抑制p38 MAPK磷酸化减轻UVB诱导的皮肤光老化损伤[J]. 日用化学工业(中英文), 2024, 54(7): 836-843. |
[3] | 吴姣娇, 章为, 王彦超, 裴新荣. 3种熊果苷的安全性评价进展及其化妆品法规管理现状[J]. 日用化学工业(中英文), 2024, 54(7): 853-858. |
[4] | 史海云, 华岩. 品牌人格化IP在化妆品包装设计中的应用[J]. 日用化学工业(中英文), 2024, 54(7): 859-865. |
[5] | 贾雪丽, 祖姆热提·艾孜则, 毕永贤, 何聪芬, 唐萌, 董坤. 两种体外评价抗氧化活性方法影响因素分析:DPPH和ABTS[J]. 日用化学工业(中英文), 2024, 54(7): 866-872. |
[6] | 王昌钊, 李子豪, 王一欣, 杨玥. UPLC-MS/MS法测定化妆品中5种美白剂[J]. 日用化学工业(中英文), 2024, 54(7): 873-878. |
[7] | 周业杰, 刘雅迪, 赵以墨, 孙晓彤, 高宇, 范金石. 天然生物质材料的制备、性质与应用(Ⅶ)——支链异构阴离子多糖胶:黄芪胶[J]. 日用化学工业(中英文), 2024, 54(7): 767-776. |
[8] | 刘兆亿, 陈鑫宇, 王艳, 李雪, 郭若曦, 张晗. 氧化苦参碱对小鼠皮肤屏障功能障碍的修复作用研究[J]. 日用化学工业(中英文), 2024, 54(7): 777-783. |
[9] | 王强, 徐永林, 刁岩. 基于月桂酰肌氨酸异丙酯为油相的高负载量槲皮素微乳的研究[J]. 日用化学工业(中英文), 2024, 54(7): 821-827. |
[10] | 张科明, 刘雪年, 邓鸣, 鲁毅翔, 许杨彪. UPLC-Q-TOF测定化妆品中9种硝基苯类化合物[J]. 日用化学工业(中英文), 2024, 54(6): 744-750. |
[11] | 王丹, 俞舜, 王玉英, 李京玲, 刘晨阳, 吕国忠. 羟基积雪草苷通过激活Nrf2-HO-1通路发挥抗衰老及皮肤修复作用[J]. 日用化学工业(中英文), 2024, 54(6): 683-690. |
[12] | 陈海峰, 杨小玉, 余昊阳, 刘蕾, 李润夏, 何聪芬. 麝香草酚三甲氧基肉桂酸酯抑制黑色素生成、转移及AGEs合成的功效研究[J]. 日用化学工业(中英文), 2024, 54(6): 691-697. |
[13] | 薛黎明, 林元杰, 金玉娥, 徐佳乐, 卢大胜, 汪国权. 全氟辛酸对成骨细胞骨形成和破骨细胞骨吸收作用研究[J]. 日用化学工业(中英文), 2024, 54(6): 648-655. |
[14] | 陈来成, 陈冬杰, 邹洁, 丁红, 叶宇鹏, 杨占红. 金线莲发酵液的抗氧化和美白功效研究[J]. 日用化学工业(中英文), 2024, 54(6): 656-662. |
[15] | 胡金金, 刘智禹, 陈小娥, 陈贝. 虚拟筛选技术在黑色素生成抑制剂研发中的应用[J]. 日用化学工业(中英文), 2024, 54(6): 718-726. |
|