裂缝性低渗油藏复合体系协同驱油适应性研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1803.2022.03.003

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对低渗油藏注水开发过程中对储层微裂缝简单调驱后,注入水易沿高渗条带发生绕流造成开发效果严重受限的问题,评价了泡沫体系起泡、稳泡性能和一种改性淀粉凝胶成胶性能,开展了泡沫微观调驱和裂缝性低渗岩心复合体系协同驱油实验,并利用径向流模型模拟油藏实际井网对复合体系协同驱油适应性进行了验证。实验结果表明：起泡剂和稳泡剂最佳质量分数分别为0.5%和0.1%,改性淀粉凝胶体系成胶后具有较高强度和突破压力;注入泡沫体系后水驱,小孔隙微观驱油效果较前期水驱提高14.21%,其在渗透率级差约为30时具有更好的调剖性能;裂缝性低渗油藏水驱过程中,采用改性淀粉凝胶联合泡沫协同驱油效果最佳,其较注入单一改性淀粉凝胶或泡沫体系后水驱采收率可分别提高22.17%和46.07%,且径向流模型验证实验表明该协同驱油方法在裂缝性低渗油藏的适应性较好。

关键词: 裂缝, 低渗油藏, 泡沫, 改性淀粉凝胶

Abstract:

In the low-permeability reservoir, injection water is easy to flow along the high-permeability strips after simply profile control on the micro-fractures, which induces severe problems in the reservoir development. In this work, the foaming and stabilizing performance of a foam system and the gelling properties of a modified starch gel were evaluated. Then, the microadjustment and flooding of the foam and the collaborative oil displacement experiment of this compound system with fractured low-permeability core were carried out. The adaptability of collaborative oil displacement was verified with radial flow model, and the actual reservoir pattern was simulated. The experimental results show that the optimal mass concentrations of foaming agent and foam stabilizer are 0.5% and 0.1%, respectively. The strength and breakthrough pressure of starch gel system is high. After foam injection, the micro oil displacement efficiency of small pores during further water flooding is 14.21% higher than that of previous water flooding. And when the permeability ratio is approximately 30, its profile control performance is better. In the process of water flooding in fractured low-permeability reservoir, the collaborative oil displacement efficiency of modified starch gel combined with foam is best, which can increase the recovery by 22.17% and 46.07% as respectively compared with that of single use of modified starch gel or foam system. Moreover, the radial flow model validation experiment shows that the adaptability of this method is good in fractured low-permeability reservoir.

Key words: fracture, low permeability reservoir, foam, modified starch gel

中图分类号:

TQ423

岳文成,范鹏,王凯,赵辉,刘安,杨红. 裂缝性低渗油藏复合体系协同驱油适应性研究[J]. 日用化学工业, 2022, 52(3): 245-252.

Yue Wencheng,Fan Peng,Wang Kai,Zhao Hui,Liu An,Yang Hong. Adaptability study on a compound system for cooperative oil displacement in fractured low-permeability reservoir[J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2022, 52(3): 245-252.

图/表 10

表1

表2

图1

图2

表3

图3

图4

表4

图5

图6

参考文献 21

[1]	Sun Xuefa, Lu Xiangguo, Sun Zhe, et al. Research on transmission and migration capacity and deep fluid diversion ability of weak-base ternary compound system-taking reservoirs in northern Saertu of Daqing oilfield as an example[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2016, 23(5) : 105-110.
[2]	Zhang Xiao, Li Liang, Fang Jichao, et al. Optimization of the lateral flooding EOR technique of bottom-water reservoir[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2020, 42(1) : 91-97.
[3]	Lu Jianping, Shen Yanbin, Wang Jia, et al. Research progress and application of nanosphere technology in oilfield[J]. Applied Chemical Industry, 2020, 49(3) : 246-250.
[4]	Xu Bing. Experimental study on distribution characteristics of remaining oil in vertical heterogeneous reservoirs by gel profile control[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2020, 27(6) : 71-84.
[5]	Tan Liangbai, Chang Lunjie, Chen Hong, et al. Application of intercalative gel-Particle profile control technology in Hade oilfield[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2020, 41(2) : 228-231.
[6]	Zheng Yufei, Li Xiang, Xu Jingliang, et al. Optimization research and application of pH responsive fluid flow direction agent affecting in-situ generated CO₂ flooding[J]. Chemical Engineering of Oil & Gas, 2020, 49(3) : 78-82.
[7]	Zhou Yanxia, Lu Xiangguo, Wang Baojiang, et al. Chromatographic separation and its influencing factors of strong-base alkali-surfactant-polymer flooding: a case of Lamadian oilfield in Daqing[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2015, 22(5) : 74-78.
[8]	Fang Hongbo. Effect of retained polymer in oil produced wastewater on the viscosity of polymer solution prepared by wastewater[J]. Oilfield Chemistry, 2021, 38(1) : 173-178.
[9]	Yang Hong, Yu Huagui, Huang Chunxia, et al. Effect of core size on the seepage characteristic of alkali/surfactant/polymer system[J]. Oilfield Chemistry, 2016, 33(4) : 710-714.
[10]	Liu Yuzhe, Li Yiqiang, Wang Xiaoguang, et al. Synergy effects of different components during ASP flooding[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum, 2016, 40(6) : 118-125.
[11]	Li Yan, Hou Jirui, Wang Xiangzeng, et al. Evaluation and long-distance transportation characteristics of online composite conformance agents[J]. Oilfield Chemistry, 2019, 36(4) : 127-133.
[12]	Wang Xiang, Guo Jixiang, Chen Jinmei. Research progress of deep profile control technology and its application[J]. Oilfield Chemistry, 2020, 37(4) : 738-744.
[13]	Lu Xiangguo, Cao Bao, Xie Kun, et al. EOR mechanisms of polymer flooding in a heterogeneous oil reservoir[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, 48(1) : 148-155.
[14]	Lang Dongjiang, Lun Zengmin, Lv Chengyuan, et al. Study of displacement characteristics of CO₂ in tight sandstone reservoir by nuclearmagnetic resonance[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2016, 25(2) : 141-147.
[15]	Wei Qing, Li Zhiping, Bai Ruiting, et al. An experimental study on the effect of microscopic pore structure on spontaneous imbibition in tight sandstones[J]. Petroleum Drilling Technology, 2016 (5) : 109-116.
[16]	Bai Songtao, Cheng Daojie, Wan Jinbin, et al. Quantitative characterization of sandstone NMR T₂ spectrum[J]. Actapetrolei Sinica, 2016, 37(3) : 382-391.
[17]	Zhao Xisen, Yang Hong, Chen Longlong, et al. CO₂ flooding and sequestration potential analysison Chang 6 layer in Huaziping oilfield of Yanchang petroleum[J]. Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 34(1) : 66-72.
[18]	Xu Changfu, Liu Hongxian, Qian Genbao, et al. Microcosmic mechanisms of water-oil displacement in conglomerate reservoirs in Karamay Oilfield, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2011, 38(6) : 725-732. doi: 10.1016/S1876-3804(12)60006-8
[19]	Guo Chen, Qin Yong, Yang Zhaobiao, et al. Coal reservoir NMR T₂ spectrum & gas-water relative permeability characteristics and their controlling factors in Bide-santang basin, western Cuizhou[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2014, 43(5) : 841-852.
[20]	Xing Xiaoxuan. Microscopic displacement mechanism and oil displacement effect of foam flooding[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2020, 27(3) : 106-112.
[21]	Zhang Jingnan, Di Qinfeng, Hua Shuai, et al. Nuclear magnetic resonance experiments on foam flooding and evaluation of foam dynamic stability[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(5) : 853-860.

矿化度/（mg/L）								pH	水型
Cl^-	HCO₃^-	Na⁺	K⁺	Mg²⁺	Ca²⁺	Ba²⁺	Fe²⁺	pH	水型
32 235	93	13 155	1 847	361	20 845	722	45	6.9	CaCl₂

实验编号		孔隙度/%	渗透率/（10^-3μm²）	渗透率级差	有无裂缝	注入段塞
1	A	15.27	3.18	10	无	地层水+0.4 PV泡沫+地层水
	A	16.47	30.26	10	无	地层水+0.4 PV泡沫+地层水
	B	15.19	3.09	30	有	地层水+0.4 PV泡沫+地层水
	B	16.15	89.58	30	有	地层水+0.4 PV泡沫+地层水
	C	14.89	2.96	30	无	地层水+0.4 PV泡沫+地层水
	C	17.68	83.27	30	无	地层水+0.4 PV泡沫+地层水
	D	14.97	3.25	50	无	地层水+0.4 PV泡沫+地层水
	D	19.02	163.18	50	无	地层水+0.4 PV泡沫+地层水
2	A	15.64	3.09	30	有	地层水+0.2 PV凝胶+地层水
	A	18.02	89.15	30	有	地层水+0.2 PV凝胶+地层水
	B	15.31	2.89	30	有	地层水+0.2 PV凝胶+地层水+0.4 PV泡沫+地层水
	B	17.68	91.39	30	有	地层水+0.2 PV凝胶+地层水+0.4 PV泡沫+地层水
	C	14.69	3.34	50	有	地层水+0.2 PV凝胶+地层水+0.4 PV泡沫+地层水
	C	19.18	170.18	50	有	地层水+0.2 PV凝胶+地层水+0.4 PV泡沫+地层水

ρ（MnCl₂）/（mg/L）	泡沫体系（0.5%起泡剂+0.1%稳泡剂）		改性淀粉凝胶
ρ（MnCl₂）/（mg/L）	起泡体积/mL	半衰期/s	弹性模量/Pa	损耗模量/Pa	突破压力/MPa
0	653	995	565	44	6.7
15 000	655	994	563	45	6.7

实验编号		水驱采收率/%	采收率提高幅度/%
实验编号		水驱采收率/%	改性淀粉凝胶+水驱	泡沫+水驱	累计
1	A	21.23	—	26.28	26.28
	B	0.68	—	1.75	1.75
	C	19.31	—	29.19	29.19
	D	17.54	—	10.89	10.89
2	A	0.65	25.65	—	25.65
	B	0.71	27.14	20.68	47.82
	C	0.67	18.74	12.23	30.97