姬塬油田耐温抗盐表面活性剂增注体系研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1803.2022.10.002

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为解决姬塬油田超低渗油藏中温、高矿化度储层注水开发效果差的问题,合成了一种新型阴-非离子表面活性剂醇醚磺酸盐DES,并与油酸酰胺型甜菜碱两性表面活性剂HGC复配,研制出一种耐温抗盐型高效复合表面活性剂增注体系。对体系性能进行了室内评价,结果表明：体系具有良好的耐温抗盐性能,在温度100~110 ℃、矿化度65.5 g/L时,油水界面张力为10^-3 mN/m数量级;在75 ℃,矿化度高于120 g/L时,油水界面张力为10^-3 mN/m数量级;在110 ℃下老化30 d后仍能保持超低界面张力水平;体系的动态吸附量较小,预示其在地层中的吸附损失较少;当注入0.2 PV的增注体系时,能够使岩心水驱后的降压率达到18.39%;当注入0.6 PV的增注体系时,能够使岩心水驱后的降压率达到30.54%。现场应用结果表明,措施后注水井注入压力下降3.0 MPa,单井累计增注11 780 m³,降压增注效果显著。

关键词: 注水井, 表面活性剂, 低渗油藏, 降压增注

Abstract:

The enhancement of oil recovery efficiency by water flooding has been restricted by the harsh conditions of the reservoirs （medium temperature, high salinity and low permeability） in Jiyuan Oilfield. Herein, a new type of anionic-nonionic surfactant, fatty alcohol ether sulfonate （DES）, was synthesized and compounded with an oleate amide betaine surfactant （HGC） that was derived from oleic acid. Thus, a flooding agent containing DES/HGC that could withstand high temperature and salinity was developed and systematically evaluated. The results confirmed the well temperature- and salt-resistance of the flooding agent. At a temperature range of 100-110 ℃ and salinity of 65.5 g/L, an ultra-low interfacial tension （~10^-3 mN/m） between the oil and the surfactant solution was obtained. At 75 ℃, an interfacial tension of ~10^-3 mN/m could also be reached when the salinity was above 120 g/L. The ultra-low interfacial tension level could still be maintained after being aged at 110 ℃ for 30 days; the dynamic adsorption of the system was weak, indicating that the adsorption loss of the surfactants in the formation was small; when 0.2 PV and 0.6 PV of flooding agent were injected into the core samples, the pressure of water flooding could be decreased by 18.39% and 30.54%, respectively. The field tests showed that the injection pressure of the water injection could be decreased by 3.0 MPa, and the cumulative injection of a single well was increased by 11 780 m³, indicative of remarkable effects of pressure reduction and injection increase.

Key words: water injection well, surfactant, low permeability reservoir, depressurization and augmented injection

中图分类号:

TQ423

陆小兵,郑延成,刘小宁,王伟,兰乐芳. 姬塬油田耐温抗盐表面活性剂增注体系研究[J]. 日用化学工业（中英文）, 2022, 52(10): 1040-1048.

Lu Xiaobing,Zheng Yancheng,Liu Xiaoning,Wang Wei,Lan Lefang. Research and application of a temperature-resistant and salt-resistant surfactant injection system for Jiyuan Oilfield[J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2022, 52(10): 1040-1048.

图/表 8

参考文献 24

[1]	Cai Yue, Li Yong, Cheng Liangbing, et al. Study of pore structure characteristics of Chang 8 low-permeability sandstone reservoirs in the Jiyuan area, Ordos basin[J]. Xinjiang Geology, 2015, 33 (1): 107-111.
[2]	Sun Chunhui. A study on stimulation of injection well of low permeability and high temperature reservoir by surfactant flooding[D]. Beijing: Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2010.
[3]	Zhao Pan, Wei Jiangwei, Zhang Ming. Discussion on characteristics and countermeasures of reservoir damage in Jiyuan oilfield[J]. Technology Supervision in Petroleum Industry, 2014 (6): 54-58.
[4]	Wu Xinmin, Fu Wei, Bai Haitao, et al. Study on compatibility between formation water and injection water in Jiyuan oilfield[J]. Oilfield Chemistry, 2012, 29 (1): 33-37.
[5]	Sun Jianbo. Influence of scaling on reservoir damage in Jiyuan oilfield and the experimental study on plugging removal[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum University, 2015.
[6]	Sun Yongtao, Li Zhaomin, Sun Yubao, et al. Synthesis and properties of high-temperature emulsified viscosity reducer AESO for heavy oil[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2021, 40 (3): 103-108.
[7]	Song Wen, Xu Fei. Depressurizing and increasing injection system of surfactant for water injection wells in low permeability reservoir[J]. Chemistry & Bioengineering, 2021, 38 (4): 48-51.
[8]	Cai Yue. Study on the relationship between reservoir evolution and oil accumulation process of Chang 8 tight sandtone oil reservoir in Jiyuan area, Ordos basin[D]. Xi’an: Chang’an University, 2015.
[9]	Li Changping, Li Dongsheng, Zhang Zhihao, et al. Advances in the application of temperature-resistant and salt-resistant compound surfactants used in decompression and augmented injection of oilfield[J]. Applied Chemical Industry, 2020, 49 (12): 3199-3204.
[10]	Zhao Lin, Wang Zenglin, Wu Xj, et al. Synthesis and performance evaluation of surfactant system with thermal stability and salt resistance of decreasing injection pressure[J]. Speciality Petrochemicals, 2017, 34 (5): 1-5.
[11]	Li Ruidong, Ge Jijiang, Li Guanghui, et al. Research on depressurization and augmented injection for ultra low interfacial tension surfactants in low permeability reservoirs[J]. Chemical Engineering of Oil & Gas, 2012, 41 (4): 415-418.
[12]	Fan Xiujiang, Wang Yang, Tang Yaohui, et al. Optimization of pressure-lowering and injection-increasing technology of surfactants for low permeability reservoir[J]. Cleaning World, 2019, 35 (9): 40-41.
[13]	Liu Jing, Liu Yi, Li Liangchuan, et al. Performance evaluation and application of pressure-lowering and injection-increasing agent in low permeability reservoir of Jidong oilfield[J]. Oilfield Chemistry, 2019, 36 (2): 271-276.
[14]	Zhu Youyi, Zhang Yi, Niu Jialing, et al. The research progress in the alkali-free surfactant-polymer combination flooding technique[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39 (3): 371-376. doi: 10.1016/S1876-3804(12)60053-6
[15]	Lu Yan, Lu Dashan, Zhang Guangzhou, et al. Synthesis and thermal stability and salt resistance properties of fatty alcohol polyoxyethylene ether (5) sulfonate[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica (Petroleum Processing Section), 2013, 29 (4): 700-705.
[16]	Liu Yu, Zheng Yancheng, Han Hexiang, et al. Synthesis and properties of carboxybetaine and sulfobetaine surfactants[J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2015, 45 (12): 680-684.
[17]	Dai Chenyi, Zheng Yancheng, Li Chunyun, et al. Study on the interaction and interfacial activity of alcohol ether sulfonate and nonionic surfactant[J]. Speciality Petrochemicals, 2020, 37 (5): 48-53.
[18]	Guo Donghong, Yang Xiaopeng, Guo Jiaxing, et al. Synergism of aliphatic alcohol polyoxyethylene ethers sulfonate surfactant series[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica (Petroleum Processing Section), 2012, 28 (2): 323-328.
[19]	Zhang Fan, Zhang Qun, Zhou Chaohui, et al. Characterization and property of a heat-resistant and salt-tolerant betaine surfactant[J]. Oilfield Chemistry, 2011, 28 (4): 427-430.
[20]	Zhao Jianhui. Synthesis, performance evaluation of temperature-resistant and salinity-tolerant surfactant and its construction of oil flooding system[D]. Qingdao: China University of Petroleum (East China), 2015.
[21]	Zhou Ming, Feng Jilei, Jiang Tongwen, et al. Primary study on EOR for high temperature and salinity reservoirs in Tarim basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2010, 31 (2): 163-166.
[22]	Wang Yefei, Li Jiyong, Zhao Fulin. Surfactants with high thermal stability and salt resistance and high salinity and their applications in oilfield[J]. Detergent & Cosmetics, 2000, 23 (S1): 130-132.
[23]	Lan Lefang, Zheng Yancheng, Lu Xiaobing, et al. Synthesis and properties of polyether ammonium salt claystabilizer[J]. Speciality Petrochemicals, 2021, 38 (3): 4-8.
[24]	Yu Jianye, Yin Hongyao, Yuan Yufeng, et al. Study on synthesis and surface activity of oleic amidopropyl group betaine surfactants[J]. Speciality Petrochemicals, 2017, 34 (3): 66-70.

Surfactant dosage/%	Weight/g	Length/cm	Diameter/cm	Permeability/mD	Pore volume（PV）/mL	Saturated adsorption capacity/（mg/g）	Surfactant remained in each core /（mg/g）
0.1	80.36	7.99	2.45	0.38	7.67	2.3	0.8
0.3	79.23	7.86	2.45	0.59	8.42	2.5	0.7
0.5	81.35	7.63	2.45	0.81	7.64	2.5	1.2

Core No.	Porosity/%	Permeability/mD	Water injection pressure/MPa	Injection volume of surfactant solution/PV	Water injection pressure /MPa	Depressurization rate/%
1	10.6	0.85	4.35	0.2	3.55	18.39
2	10.5	0.74	4.68	0.4	3.55	24.15
3	10.3	0.68	4.65	0.6	3.23	30.54
4	10.4	0.72	4.73	0.8	3.25	31.29

Physical properties of Chang-2 reservoir	Porosity/%	10.4
Physical properties of Chang-2 reservoir	Permeability/mD	0.85
Water flooding before DES/HGC injection	Equilibrium injection pressure/MPa	21.5
	Water injection volume/m³	11
	Apparent water absorption index m³/ （d·MPa^-1）	1.037
Water flooding after DES/HGC injection	Equilibrium injection pressure/MPa	18.5
	Water injection volume/m³	20
	Apparent water absorption index m³/ （d·MPa^-1）	3.111
The cumulative injection volume of water/m³		11 780
Depressurization rate/%		13.95