Q弹粉底霜感官特性与其质构参数相关性的研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1803.2021.03.007

Abstract

Abstract:

The textural and sensory analyses of five products of elastic foundation creams with different thickener content were carried out. The results obtained by a texture analyzer showed that, with the increase of thickener content, the hardness of the product increased gradually, while the springiness, adhesiveness, cohesiveness and other parameters were first increased and then decreased. The sensory results showed that the skin softness during the application of the product had a strong correlation with hardness and cohesiveness, and the correlation coefficients were 0.909 and 0.745, respectively. The spreadability of the foundation cream had significantly negative correlation with the textural hardness, with a correlation coefficient of -0.512. The elasticity （a sensory parameter） had a strong correlation with the springiness （a textural parameter）, and the correlation coefficient was 0.774. The results showed that the parameters obtained by the texture analyzer had good correlation with the sensory tests. The study proved that it had potential to use instruments to predict sensory test results for cosmetic products.

Key words: elastic foundation cream, texture analyzer, sensory evaluation

CLC Number:

TQ658

LIN Meng-ya,YU Wei-hong. Study of the correlations between the sensory characteristics of elastic foundation creams and their textural parameters[J].China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2021, 51(3): 208-213.

Figures/Tables 8

Tab. 1

Tab. 2

Fig. 1

Tab. 3

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Tab. 4

Tab. 5

References 10

[1]	Wang Shuo, Dong Yinmou, He Congfen, et al. The research on sensory evaluation and rheological properties of cosmetics[J]. Flavour Fragrance Cosmetics, 2011,2(1) ：42-46.
[2]	Estanqueiro M, Amaral M H, Sousa Lobo J M. Comparison between sensory and instrumental characterization of topical formulations: impact of thickening agents[J]. Int J Cosmet Sci, 2016,28(4) ：389-98.
[3]	Tai A, Bianchini R, Jachowicz J. Texture analysis of cosmetic/pharmaceutical raw materials and formulations[J]. Int J Cosmet Sci, 2014,36(4) ：291-304. pmid: 24575934
[4]	Hurler J, Engesland A, Poorahmary Kermany B, et al. Improved texture analysis for hydrogel characterization: gel cohesiveness, adhesiveness, and hardness[J]. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2012,125(1) ：180-188.
[5]	Calixto L S, Infante V H P, Maia Campos P. Design and characterization of topical formulations: correlations between instrumental and sensorial measurements[J]. AAPS PharmSciTech, 2018,19(4) ：1512-1519. pmid: 29464591
[6]	Zhang Wan, Tang Jiawen, Luo Rong, et al. Correlation between the results of sensory assessment and those obtained by texture analyzer and rheometer for creams[J]. Academic Journals, 2019,6(42) ：23-29.
[7]	Bogdan C, Moldovan M L, Man I M, et al. Preliminary study on the development of an antistretch marks water-in-oil cream: ultrasound assessment, texture analysis, and sensory analysis[J]. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol, 2016 (9) ：249-255.
[8]	Liu Yi, Gao Jun. Thickener in cosmetics[J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2003,33(1) ：44-48.
[9]	Salawi A, Nazzal S. The rheological and textural characterization of Soluplus(R)/Vitamin E composites[J]. Int J Pharm, 2018,546(1/2) ：255-262.
[10]	Li Jialin, Yao Yunzhen, Lin Shaobin, Studies on influencing factors in viscosity of gelatin[J]. The Science and Technology of Gelatin, 2014,34(4) ：200-204.

	成分（INCI名）	含量/%
水相	TR-2（丙烯酸（酯）类/C10-30烷醇丙烯酸酯交联聚合物）	0.4~0.9
	1, 2-戊二醇	2
	甘油	5
	1, 3-丁二醇	4
油相	甘油硬脂酸酯/PEG-100硬脂酸酯	2
	环五聚二甲基硅氧烷	4
	季戊四醇四（乙基己酸）酯	2
	氢化聚异丁烯	2
	云母/聚二甲基硅氧烷	1
	二氧化钛/氧化铁/三异硬脂酸异丙氧钛盐/聚二甲基硅氧烷/硅石	8
	氨甲基丙醇/水	0.3~0.5
	香精	0.1
	苯氧乙醇	0.5
	水	补充至100

评价阶段	感官评价词汇	具体定义描述	评分范围
使用前	挑起性	蘸取膏体的难易程度	1~10分
	硬度	蘸取适量膏体时,膏体表面硬度	1~10分
	弹性	蘸取膏体时的弹性	1~10分
	黏腻感	手指与料体间的粘合程度	1~10分
使用时	涂抹性	膏体涂抹开时的难易程度	1~10分

样品	TR2-0.4	TR2-0.6	TR2-0.7	TR2-0.8	TR2-0.9	显著性
质构弹性/mm	9.15	9.44	9.81	9.45	9.36	<0.01
质构硬度/g	14.27	28.80	75.27	104.80	105.90	<0.01
质构黏性/mJ	0.37	1.10	0.76	0.74	0.67	<0.01
质构内聚性	0.75	0.79	0.90	0.89	0.88	<0.01

感官评价词汇	样品					显著性
感官评价词汇	TR2-0.4	TR2-0.6	TR2-0.7	TR2-0.8	TR2-0.9	显著性
挑起性	6.43^b	4.92^c	5.00^c	6.33^b	7.75^a	<0.01
硬度	2.71^c	2.91^c	5.00^b	7.41^a	7.50^a	<0.01
使用前弹性	3.16^c	3.41^b	5.00^a	3.67^b	2.67^c	<0.01
黏感	3.57^b	6.50^a	5.00^b	5.58^abc	5.75^abc	<0.01
涂抹性	6.28^ab	7.08^a	5.00^b	4.83^bc	4.92^bc	<0.01

参数	挑起性	硬度	使用前弹性	黏感	涂抹性
质构硬度	0.365^**	0.909^**	0.021	0.108	-0.512^**
质构弹性	-0.383^**	0.045	0.774^**	0.082	-0.191
质构黏性	-0.388^**	-0.269^*	0.230	0.446^**	0.267^*
质构内聚性	0.132	0.745^**	0.361^**	0.087	-0.506^**

Study of the correlations between the sensory characteristics of elastic foundation creams and their textural parameters

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 10

Related Articles 5

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10

[1]	Wenrui Zhou, Jianbiao He, Qian Jiao, Zidi Wang, Qianqian Su, Yan Jia. Research progress of the correlation between sensory evaluation and instrumental analysis of cosmetics in O/W emulsion system [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2024, 54(3): 344-352.
[2]	YIN Yue-xuan, LI Cheng-tong, WANG Chun-xiao, ZHU Wen-jing, ZHAO Hua. Efficacy evaluation of cosmetics (Ⅹ)Scientific support for the claim of subjective efficacyof cosmetics [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2018, 48(12): 675-679.
[3]	YIN Yue-xuan, QIU Xiao-feng, YANG Cui-lan, LI Cheng-tong, ZHAO Hua. Evaluating the effect of mask material on its performance based on subjective and objective analysis methods [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2017, 47(12): 703-708.
[4]	WANG Fei-fei,MA Xiao,MO Jun-ying,WU Meng-jie,YIN Yuan-yuan,LIN Wen-qiang. Sensory evaluation of commercial moisturizing lotions based on principal component analysis and cluster analysis [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2016, 46(12): 718-722.
[5]	YUE Hai-bo, LIANG Ya, CHEN Yi-kun, DAI Li, GUO Chun-sheng, ZHANG Jun-song. Synthesis of menthyl menthylformate [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2014, 44(3): 147-150.