Fig.1

TEWL content of back skin of mice（n=3, * represents control compared with model group, ****P<0.000 1; # represents model compared with EJ group, ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.001）"

Fig.2

C-cube imaging of mouse back skin (A), and statistics of mean blood flow (B) and roughness (C)(n=3, * represents control compared with model group, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.000 1; # represents model compared with EJ group, #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.001; & represents pre-EJ compared with post-EJ, &P < 0.05)"

Fig.3

OCT imaging of mouse back skin (A) and statistics of the thickness of the dorsal epidermis (A) of mice (n=3, * represents control compared with model group, ***P<0.001, ****P<0.000 1; # represents model compared with EJ group, #P<0.05, ###P<0.001; & represents pre-EJ compared with post-EJ, &P<0.05)"

Fig.4

HE staining (A), epidermal thickness (B) and stratum comeum thickness (C) of back skin in mice (n=3, * represents control compared with model group, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001, ****P<0.000 1; # represents model compared with EJ group, #P< 0.05, ##P< 0.01)"

Fig.5

Effect of Dong’e Ejiao on the expression of skin barrier protein in the damaged area of back skin in mice (n=3, * represents control compared with model group, *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001, ****P<0.000 1; # represents model compared with EJ group, #P<0.05, ##P<0.01, ###P<0.001, ####P<0.000 1; & represents pre-EJ compared with post-EJ, &P<0.05, &&P<0.01, &&&&P<0.000 1)"

Fig.6

The immunofluorescence staining (A), fluorescence intensity statistics of TSLP (B) on the dorsal skin of mice and the influence on the expression of inflammatory factor genes (C) on the 7th day (n=3, * represents control compared with model group, *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001, ****P<0.000 1; # represents model compared with EJ group, ##P< 0.01, ###P< 0.001, ####P<0.000 1)"