欢迎访问《日用化学工业(中英文)》,今天是

日用化学工业 ›› 2022, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (2): 190-198.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1803.2022.02.012

• 专论与综述 • 上一篇    下一篇

国际化妆品监管模式对比分析与启示

曹爔1,陈坚生2,刘佐仁1,5,*(),谢志洁3,*(),陈旻4   

  1. 1. 广东药科大学 药学院,广东 广州 510006
    2. 广东省药品监督管理局审评认证中心,广东 广州 510080
    3. 广东省药品监督管理局,广东 广州 510080
    4. 广东省药品检验所,广东 广州 510000
    5. 国家药品监督管理局 药物警戒技术研究与评价重点实验室,广东 广州 510006
  • 收稿日期:2021-10-26 修回日期:2022-01-17 出版日期:2022-02-25 发布日期:2022-02-22
  • 通讯作者: 刘佐仁,谢志洁
  • 基金资助:
    药品(天然药物方向)监管科学体系及学科建设研究(2019YDZ22)

Comparative analysis and enlightenment of international cosmetics supervision modes

Cao Xi1,Chen Jiansheng2,Liu Zuoren1,5,*(),Xie Zhijie3,*(),Chen Min4   

  1. 1. School of Pharmacy, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510006, China
    2. Center for Certification and Evaluation, Guangdong Food and Drug Administration, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510080, China
    3. Guangdong Medical Products Administration, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510080, China
    4. Guangdong Institute for Drug Control, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510000, China
    5. Key Laboratory for Technology Research and Evaluation of Pharmacovigilance, National Medical Products Administration, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510006, China
  • Received:2021-10-26 Revised:2022-01-17 Online:2022-02-25 Published:2022-02-22
  • Contact: Zuoren Liu,Zhijie Xie

摘要:

研究美国、欧盟、日本和中国化妆品监管模式的异同,借鉴国外化妆品监管模式的先进经验,为促进中国化妆品监管创新,寻找更多的新方法、新工具、新标准、新制度,推进化妆品治理体系和治理能力的现代化提供参考。采用文献研究法和对比分析法,通过相关文献和网站等查找化妆品监管模式相关文件,对美国、欧盟、日本和中国四个国家地区化妆品的定义、监管部门、法律法规、相关社会组织及监管方法等方面进行对比分析。美国和欧盟监管体系较为成熟完备,监管模式又有各自不同的特点,日本和中国都向美欧接轨。欧盟采用市场主导模式,实施化妆品责任人制度和备案制度,相对弱化目前生产准入的事前监管,强化事中事后的政府监管,行业协会制定标准和规范行业自律等作用都处于世界领先水平。

关键词: 化妆品监管, 监管方法, 对比分析, 经验启示

Abstract:

The aim is to study the similarities and differences of cosmetics supervision modes in the United States(US), European Union(EU), Japan, and China, and learn from the advanced experience of foreign cosmetics supervision modes, so as to provide reference for promoting the innovation of China’s cosmetics supervision, looking for more new methods, tools, standards and systems, and promoting the modernization of cosmetics management system and management ability. Literature research method and comparative analysis method were adopted to find documents related to cosmetics supervision mode through relevant literature and websites, and comparative analysis was conducted on cosmetics definitions, regulatory departments, laws and regulations, relevant social organizations and supervision methods in the US, EU, Japan and China. The regulatory systems of US and EU are relatively mature and complete, and the supervision modes have their own different characteristics. Japan and China are in line with US and EU. The EU adopts a market-oriented model, implements a cosmetics responsible person system and a filing system,relatively weakens the current pre-regulation of production access, strengthens the government’s supervision during and after the event, and the role of industry associations in formulating standards and regulating industry self-discipline is at the world’s leading level.

Key words: cosmetics regulation, supervision method, comparative analysis, experience revelation

中图分类号: 

  • TQ658