口红持久度评价体系的建立

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1803.2021.08.008

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

口红属于彩妆产品,与功效性产品的不同之处在于其既要带来美的感受又要追求妆容的即时效果。目前鲜有关于口红持妆力测试的论文,本研究旨在建立综合客观的口红持久度评价指标和分级图谱。对涂抹口红的志愿者进行人为干扰处理模拟口红脱妆过程,采集志愿者唇部图像并对口红颜色变化进行数据分析后建立数学模型,对口红持妆给予客观的量化判定,同时建立分级图谱。结果发现,在口红图像数据的客观化评价中,口红的颜色和颜色的均匀度是计算持妆指数的主要影响因素,所建立的口红持妆分级图谱将口红的持妆程度分为6个等级,一级为持妆率100%的状态,随着级别升高持妆率降低。建立了直观、量化的图谱和模型用于判定口红的持妆程度,为彩妆感官评价方法学的发展提供了全新的思路和数据支持。

关键词: 口红, 持妆率, 持久度, 分级图谱

Abstract:

As a color cosmetic product, lipstick not only brings beauty, but also pursues the instant effect of makeup. Currently, there are few papers on lipstick makeup retention test. The aim of the study was to establish a comprehensive and objective evaluation index and grading map of lipstick durability. Firstly, the volunteers who applied lipstick were subjected to artificial interference processing to simulate the lipstick take-off process and the lip image of the volunteers were captured by VISIA-CR. Then Image Pro Plus （IPP） software was used to analyze the front face photos taken by VISIA-CR under natural light, and SPSS 22.0 statistical software was applied to perform correlation analysis and factor analysis between indicators. Finally a mathematical model was established to objectively determine the lipstick color persistence and to establish a grading map. The results show that in the objective evaluation of lipstick image data, the color and uniformity of the lipstick are the main factors influencing the calculation of makeup retention index. The established lipstick retention grading map divides the durability of lipstick into 6 levels. The retention rate of level 1, level 3 and level 6 are 100%, 89% and 15%, respectively. And the makeup retention rate decreases as the level increases. The research results can provide technical support for the determination of lipstick makeup retention. It can also be used for market development and consumer market research. The atlas gives an objective and quantitative judgment on lipstick rentention ability. The subjective judgment of the level of lipstick makeup removal will be affected by the surrounding environment and personal subjective consciousness. The model can be applied to judge the level of lipstick makeup removal by collecting relevant index data. In the future, it is interesting to explore other color lipstick models, such as orange, brown, pink, etc. This experimental method has laid a solid foundation for the experimental research and data analysis of lipstick.

Key words: lipstick, makeup retention rate, persistence, grading map

中图分类号:

TQ658

岑晓娟,王颖,周荷益,刘唯一,周琳,盘瑶. 口红持久度评价体系的建立[J]. 日用化学工业, 2021, 51(8): 748-753.

Cen Xiaojuan,Wang Ying,Zhou Heyi,Liu Weiyi,Zhou Lin,Pan Yao. Research on the establishment of lipstick persistence evaluation system[J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2021, 51(8): 748-753.

图/表 8

图1

表1

表2

表3

表4

图2

表5

图3

参考文献 17

[1]	Macdonald D, Dildar Y. Social and psychological determinants of consumption: Evidence for the lipstick effect during the Great Recession[J]. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 2020, 86.
[2]	Rafferty D W, Dupin L, Zellia J, et al. Predicting lipstick sensory properties with laboratory tests[J]. International Journal of Cosmetic Science, 2018, 40(5).
[3]	Tanida M, Okabe M, Tagai K, et al. Evaluation of pleasure-displeasure induced by use of lipsticks with Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS): usefulness of 2-channel NIRS in neuromarketing[J]. Advances in Experimental Medicine & Biology, 2017.
[4]	Oliveira D N, Siqueira M, Sartor S. Direct analysis of lipsticks by Sorptive tape‐like extraction laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry imaging[J]. International Journal of Cosmetic Science, 2013, 35(5) : 467-471. doi: 10.1111/ics.12066 pmid: 23651468
[5]	Ryu J S, Park S G, Kwak T J, et al. Improving lip wrinkles: lipstick‐related image analysis[J]. Skin Research and Technology, 2005, 11(3).
[6]	Richard C, Tillé-Salmon B, Mofid Y. Contribution to interplay between a delamination test and a sensory analysis of mid-range lipsticks[J]. International Journal of Cosmetic Science, 2016, 38(1) : 100-108. doi: 10.1111/ics.12242 pmid: 26010691
[7]	Tatsuya H, Minako H. Development of a new evaluation method for chapped lips [C]// Shanghai: Proceedings of the 2006 China Cosmetics Symposium, 2006.
[8]	Ye Congxiu, Lai Wei, Yi Jinling, et al. Research on the evaluation method of lip moisturizing effect of lip moisturizing cosmetics[J]. Chinese Journal of Aesthetic Medicine, 2010, 19(1) : 75-77.
[9]	Wang Hui, Jian Shaoyong, Li Juan, et al. A brief talk on the application of three statistical analysis methods in mathematical modeling[J]. Science Consulting (Education and Research), 2020 (10) : 95-96.
[10]	He Jiahuan. An empirical analysis of the profitability of commercial banks based on factor analysis[J]. Modern Business, 2020 (26) : 131-132.
[11]	Arabiat D, Whitehead L, Sheikh B A, et al. Confirmatory factor analysis and reliability of the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) for arabic speaking patients with type II diabetes[J]. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 2020.
[12]	Olivier F, Flora J. Factor analysis of ancient population genomic samples[J]. Nature Communications, 2020, 11(1).
[13]	Wei Yanhua, Wang Bingshen. Sampling method of multi-dimensional correlated random variables[J]. Statistics and Decision, 2020, 36(17) : 5-8.
[14]	Lu F, Xue L G, Hu Y P. Robust estimation for the correlation matrix of multivariate longitudinal data[J]. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 2020, 90(13).
[15]	Chen Xiangyang, Hu Xiaoqian, Wu Yongxiang, et al. Application of principal component analysis method in the performance evaluation of core courses of biotechnology[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 48(16) : 262-264.
[16]	Vishal S, Anchal B, Raj K. On the spectroscopic investigation of lipstick stains: Forensic trace evidence[J]. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, 2019, 215:48-57. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2019.02.093
[17]	Zhou Wenwei, Weng Guoqing, Jin Yan. The design and teaching application of verification experimental platform[J]. Education Teaching Forum, 2020 (22) : 391-392.

	\|r\|
	B1	B2	B3	B4	B5
B1	1.000
B2	0.865^**	1.000
B3	0.879^**	0.815^**	1.000
B4	0.928^**	0.850^**	0.963^**	1.000
B5	0.571^**	0.567^**	0.223^**	0.376^**	1.000

KMO取样适切性量数		0.741
巴特利特球形度检验	近似卡方	2 928.901
	自由度	10.000
	显著性	0

成分	初始特征值			提取载荷平方和			旋转载荷平方和
成分	总计	方差百分比/%	累积/%	总计	方差百分比/%	累积/%	总计	方差百分比/%	累积/%
1	3.911	78.225	78.225	3.911	78.225	78.225	3.387	67.740	67.740
2	0.864	17.279	95.504	0.864	17.279	95.504	1.388	27.764	95.504
3	0.155	3.096	98.600
4	0.047	0.943	99.543
5	0.023	0.457	100.000

	成分
	1	2
B1	0.216	0.127
B2	0.182	0.178
B3	0.394	-0.299
B4	0.329	-0.130
B5	-0.260	0.921

级别	润泽红持妆率/%
1级	100
2级	93
3级	89
4级	79
5级	39
6级	15