基于主客观分析评价面膜材质对其性能的影响

doi:10.13218/j.cnki.csdc.2017.12.010

Abstract

Abstract: Performance of facial mask made from seven kinds of different materials were studied with various subjective and/or objective means such as safety evaluation, sensory evaluation, instrument test and questionnaire survey etc.Results show that the performance of seven kinds of facial mask are obviously different.The skin irritation of cotton facial mask is smaller.The sensory evaluation result of TENCELSKIN facial mask (a) displays higher characteristic strength, while its effect on values for human skin MMV and Gray Index T are bigger.The questionnaire scores for TENCELSKIN facial mask (b) are higher.In general, the comprehensive performance of TENCELSKIN facial mask (a) and cotton facial mask are better.

Key words: facial mask, sensory evaluation, safety evaluation, instrument test

CLC Number:

TQ658

YIN Yue-xuan, QIU Xiao-feng, YANG Cui-lan, LI Cheng-tong, ZHAO Hua. Evaluating the effect of mask material on its performance based on subjective and objective analysis methods[J].China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2017, 47(12): 703-708.

References

[1] 苏婷婷.纤维面膜材料结构与性能分析及主客观评价相关性研究[D].上海:东华大学,2015.
[2] 范珺.不同加工工艺对面膜基材舒适性的影响分析[J].化纤与纺织技术,2016,9(45):30-33.
[3] 彭富兵,焦晓宁,莎仁.新型水刺美容面膜基布[J].纺织学报,2007,28(12):51-53.
[4] 侯彩虹,崔运花.纺织品感官评估的进展与展望[J].东华大学学报(自然科学版),2003,29(3):110-114.
[5] ASTM International.Standard practice for descriptive skin feel analysis of creams and lotions:ASTM E1490-3 [S].West Conshohocken,2003.
[6] 周兆清,李亚男.亲水性聚合物对膏霜化妆品感官及流变性质的影响[J].化学世界,2017(4):228-234.
[7] 周家春.食品感官分析[M].北京:中国轻工业出版社,2013.
[8] 周兆清,曹蕊,王楠,等.感官评价在化妆品中的应用[J].日用化学品科学,2015,38(10):10-13.
[9] ASTM International.Standard guide for two sensory descriptive analysis approaches for skin creams and lotions:ASTM E1490-11 [S].West Conshohocken,2011.
[10] 陶丽莉,刘洋,吴金昊,等.化妆品美白功效评价方法研究进展[J].日用化学品科学,2015,38(3):15-21.
[11] Nico S,Jana V,Stan P.The hunt for natural skin whitening agents [J].Int J Mol Sci,2009(10):5326-5349.
[12] Gilbert,Laura,Picard,et al.Impact of polymers on texture properties of cosmetic emulsions:a methodological approach [J].Journal of Sensory Study,2012,27(5):392-402.
[13] 王颖颖,侯利霞.主成分分析法评价市售芝麻酱产品品质[J].2017,36(6):310-314.
[14] 汪东华.多元统计分析与SPSS应用[M].上海:华东理工大学出版社,2010:187-204.
[15] 李汴生,顾苗青,阮征,等.市售烤鸡翅产品的品质评价[J].现代食品科技,2015,31(2):232-239,217.
[16] 刘美迎,李小龙,梁茁,等.基于模糊数学和聚类分析的鲜食葡萄品种综合品质评价[J].食品科学,2015,36(13):57-64.

Evaluating the effect of mask material on its performance based on subjective and objective analysis methods

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10

[1]	Wenrui Zhou, Jianbiao He, Qian Jiao, Zidi Wang, Qianqian Su, Yan Jia. Research progress of the correlation between sensory evaluation and instrumental analysis of cosmetics in O/W emulsion system [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2024, 54(3): 344-352.
[2]	Linling Lu, Hui Lu, Chunyan Min, Yefei Qian. Determination of functional components of Glycyrrhizae, Ginseng and Scutellariae in facial masks by UHPLC-MS/MS [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2024, 54(1): 107-113.
[3]	He Miao, Su Zhe, Hu Kang, Zhang Fenglan, Wang Gangli, Lu Yong. Discussion of cosmetic ingredient management and regulatory system of cosmetic ingredient safety information submission [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2023, 53(9): 1080-1086.
[4]	Wang Min, Li Mengyue, Li Xiaoyi, Liu Qi, Zhao Hua, Zhao Fengnian. On-site and rapid electrochemical method for chloramphenicol detection in facial masks [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2023, 53(7): 802-807.
[5]	Wang Dongdong,Sun Qianru,Wang Ziwen,Fang Jiaxuan,Li Meng,Wang Changtao. Study on the anti-aging and whitening effects of grape seed fermentation broth [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2022, 52(5): 545-552.
[6]	Zhang Hongyan,Shi Xiaofeng,Wang Xiaoqiao,Liu Xingguo,Liu Yapeng,Li Yun. Study on transdermal absorption and skin irritation of fluorescent whitening agents in facial mask [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2022, 52(3): 322-327.
[7]	Su Zhe,Hu Kang,Wang Gangli,Lu Yong. Establishment and prospects of the database for safety information on cosmetic ingredients in China [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2022, 52(11): 1221-1228.
[8]	Tan Huimin,Wang Tao,Zhu Bin,Ling Wenchao,Fan Lanyan. Identification and analysis of Pluralibacter gergoviae in facial masks based on MALDI-TOF MS [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2022, 52(10): 1107-1112.
[9]	Zhou Zheng,Wu Mengjie,Wang Yi,Lin Wenqiang,Guo Miao,Yang Fan. The EEG study of facial mask act on consumers’ mental relaxation [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2021, 51(7): 662-669.
[10]	LIN Meng-ya,YU Wei-hong. Study of the correlations between the sensory characteristics of elastic foundation creams and their textural parameters [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2021, 51(3): 208-213.
[11]	Qiao Yasen,Dong Yalei,Huang Chuanfeng,Wang Haiyan,Sun Lei. Simultaneous determination of 63 hormone drugs in facial masks by UHPLC-MS/MS [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2021, 51(12): 1259-1268.
[12]	LIU Fang,ZHANG Qian,YANG Bin,HE Hua-kang,YANG Lei,GUO Chun-hua. Study on preparation process and safety evaluation of handmade soap containing Corni Fructus polysaccharide [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2019, 49(4): 248-252.
[13]	JIANG Zhen-juan. Consistency of sunscreen SPF values measured by in vivo and in vitro methods [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2019, 49(4): 234-237.
[14]	YIN Yue-xuan, LI Cheng-tong, WANG Chun-xiao, ZHU Wen-jing, ZHAO Hua. Efficacy evaluation of cosmetics (Ⅹ)Scientific support for the claim of subjective efficacyof cosmetics [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2018, 48(12): 675-679.
[15]	CAI Rui, HE Wen-dan, TANG Ying, PAN Yao, ZHAO Hua. Progress with respect to safety evaluation methods for cosmetic photoirritation and photoallergy [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2017, 47(10): 588-592.