China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics ›› 2021, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (11): 1142-1149.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1803.2021.11.015
• Analytical methods and testing • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2021-01-18
Revised:
2021-10-27
Online:
2021-11-22
Published:
2021-11-19
Contact:
Jing Ren
E-mail:renjing515@126.com
CLC Number:
Du Hui,Ren Jing. Simultaneous determination of 26 prohibited substances in masks by ultra performance liquid chromatography-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry[J].China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2021, 51(11): 1142-1149.
Tab. 1
Information of standard substances"
序号 | 名称 | CAS号 | 来源 | 批号 | 含量/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 氟康唑 | 86386-73-4 | 中国食品药品检定研究院 | 100314-201204 | 100.0 |
2 | 酮康唑 | 79156-75-5 | 中国食品药品检定研究院 | 100294-201904 | 99.8 |
3 | 盐酸萘替芬 | 65473-14-5 | 中国食品药品检定研究院 | 100823-200501 | 100.0 |
4 | 灰黄霉素 | 126-07-8 | 中国食品药品检定研究院 | 0426-9101 | 99.0 |
5 | 联苯苄唑 | 60628-96-8 | Stanford Chemicals | ML190411-08 | 98.0 |
6 | 克霉唑 | 23593-75-1 | Stanford Chemicals | BL190913-04 | 98.0 |
7 | 益康唑 | 27220-47-9 | Mikromol | W993634 | 100.2 |
8 | 咪康唑 | 22916-47-8 | Sigma-aldrich | LRAB5528 | 99.5 |
9 | 依诺沙星 | 74011-58-8 | 中国食品药品检定研究院 | 130453-201802 | 91.5 |
10 | 氟罗沙星 | 79660-72-3 | 中国食品药品检定研究院 | 130458-200902 | 99.2 |
11 | 甲磺酸培氟沙星 | 70458-95-6 | 中国食品药品检定研究院 | 130459-201402 | 71.3 |
12 | 氧氟沙星 | 82419-36-1 | Stanford Chemicals | ML191030-15 | 99.0 |
13 | 诺氟沙星 | 70458-96-7 | Stanford Chemicals | ML190609-10 | 99.0 |
14 | 盐酸环丙沙星 | 86393-32-0 | Stanford Chemicals | AL190415-12 | 99.0 |
15 | 恩诺沙星 | 93106-60-6 | Stanford Chemicals | TC180203-07 | 98.0 |
16 | 盐酸沙拉沙星 | 91296-87-6 | Stanford Chemicals | AL190423-20 | 98.0 |
17 | 盐酸双氟沙星 | 91296-86-5 | Dr.Ehrenstorfer GmbH | 114618 | 96.0 |
18 | 盐酸莫西沙星 | 186826-86-8 | European Pharmacopoeia Reference Standard | Y0000703 | 96.1 |
19 | 氟轻松 | 67-73-2 | USP Reference Standard | R041G0 | 99.7 |
20 | 倍他米松 | 378-44-9 | 中国食品药品检定研究院 | 100118-201204 | 99.3 |
21 | 曲安奈德 | 76-25-5 | 中国食品药品检定研究院 | 100055-201804 | 98.8 |
22 | 地塞米松 | 50-02-2 | Dr.Ehrenstorfer GmbH | 12170400 | 99.1 |
23 | 地塞米松醋酸酯 | 1177-87-3 | Dr.Ehrenstorfer GmbH | 12170410 | 99.4 |
24 | 倍他米松醋酸酯 | 987-24-6 | Dr.Ehrenstorfer GmbH | 995870 | 99.6 |
25 | 倍他米松戊酸酯 | 2152-44-5 | Dr.Ehrenstorfer GmbH | 10575020 | 99.6 |
26 | 曲安奈德醋酸酯 | 3870-07-3 | Cato Research Chemical Inc | 13F-12-19 | 99.7 |
Tab. 2
MS parameters for 26 compounds"
序号 | 名称 | 保留时间/min | 母离子(m/z) | 子离子(m/z) | 碰撞电压/eV |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 氟康唑 | 2.4 | 307.20 | 238.15*,20.15 | -16.0,-17.0 |
2 | 酮康唑 | 12.0 | 531.25 | 489.20*,255.05 | -32.0,-36.0 |
3 | 萘替芬 | 11.8 | 288.20 | 117.15*,141.15 | -20.0,-23.0 |
4 | 联苯苄唑 | 13.8 | 311.20 | 243.15*,165.15 | -20.0,-36.0 |
5 | 克霉唑 | 13.6 | 277.15 | 165.15*,241.20 | -20.0,-27.0 |
6 | 益康唑 | 15.0 | 381.10 | 125.10*,193.20 | -30.0,-20.0 |
7 | 咪康唑 | 16.0 | 417.05 | 159.05*,161.10 | -29.0,-33.0 |
8 | 灰黄霉素 | 12.7 | 353.10 | 165.15*,215.10 | -20.0,-20.0 |
9 | 依诺沙星 | 1.1 | 321.15 | 303.15*,204.05 | -20.0,-40.0 |
10 | 氟罗沙星 | 1.4 | 370.20 | 326.15*,269.10 | -20.0,-27.0 |
11 | 氧氟沙星 | 1.3 | 362.25 | 318.20*,261.15 | -19.0,-28.0 |
12 | 诺氟沙星 | 1.3 | 320.15 | 302.15*,276.10 | -21.0,-17.0 |
13 | 培氟沙星 | 1.4 | 334.20 | 290.20*,233.15 | -18.0,-25.0 |
14 | 环丙沙星 | 1.5 | 332.15 | 288.15*,245.10 | -17.0,-24.0 |
15 | 恩诺沙星 | 2.0 | 360.20 | 316.20*,245.15 | -19.0,-27.0 |
16 | 沙拉沙星 | 2.9 | 386.15 | 342.10*,299.10 | -19.0,-27.0 |
17 | 双氟沙星 | 3.0 | 400.15 | 356.15*,299.10 | -18.0,-30.0 |
18 | 莫西沙星 | 3.7 | 402.20 | 358.20*,384.20 | -22.0,-20.0 |
19 | 氟轻松 | 12.1 | 453.20 | 337.10*,121.10 | -17.0,-36.0 |
20 | 曲安奈德 | 12.0 | 435.20 | 415.10*,339.10 | -10.0,-16.0 |
21 | 倍他米松 | 8.5 | 393.20 | 373.20*,355.10 | -9.0,-13.0 |
22 | 地塞米松 | 8.9 | 393.20 | 373.20*,355.10 | -9.0,-13.0 |
23 | 地塞米松醋酸酯 | 14.2 | 435.20 | 415.10*,397.10 | -9.0,-12.0 |
24 | 倍他米松醋酸酯 | 13.9 | 435.20 | 415.20*,397.10 | -9.0,-12.0 |
25 | 倍他米松戊酸酯 | 16.3 | 477.30 | 355.10*,279.10 | -12.0,-18.0 |
26 | 曲安奈德醋酸酯 | 15.6 | 477.20 | 339.10*,439.20 | -17.0,-15.0 |
Tab. 3
Linear equations, linear ranges, correlation coefficients(r), LODs and LOQs of 26 compounds"
序号 | 名称 | 线性方程 | 线性范围/(μg·g-1) | r | LOD/(ng·g-1) | LOQ/(ng·g-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 氟康唑 | y=4.254×105x+2.256×104 | 0.96~28.95 | 0.999 8 | 2 | 10 |
2 | 酮康唑 | y=7.017×104 x-7.178×103 | 0.95~28.50 | 0.999 4 | 76 | 380 |
3 | 萘替芬 | y=3.106×106 x-1.151×105 | 1.00~30.06 | 0.999 9 | 1 | 4 |
4 | 联苯苄唑 | y=2.150×106 x+2.940×104 | 0.97~28.99 | 0.999 9 | 1 | 4 |
5 | 克霉唑 | y=1.863×106 x+7.755×104 | 0.98~29.46 | 0.999 9 | 4 | 20 |
6 | 益康唑 | y=1.776×106 x+5.196×104 | 0.96~28.84 | 0.999 9 | 1 | 4 |
7 | 咪康唑 | y=1.031×106 x+3.125×104 | 1.00~29.91 | 0.999 9 | 8 | 20 |
8 | 灰黄霉素 | y=3.540×105 x-2.646×103 | 0.96~28.88 | 1.000 0 | 8 | 20 |
9 | 依诺沙星 | y=5.274×105 x-4.251×104 | 1.00~19.90 | 0.998 5 | 80 | 320 |
10 | 氟罗沙星 | y=3.804×105 x-1.199×104 | 1.00~20.07 | 0.999 7 | 16 | 40 |
11 | 氧氟沙星 | y=5.383×105 x+2.571×104 | 1.05~21.09 | 0.999 6 | 8 | 16 |
12 | 诺氟沙星 | y=3.171×105 x+4.753×103 | 1.03~20.55 | 0.997 0 | 16 | 40 |
13 | 培氟沙星 | y=5.291×105 x-1.570×104 | 1.02~20.48 | 0.999 3 | 8 | 16 |
14 | 环丙沙星 | y=1.522×105 x-3.624×103 | 1.03~20.62 | 0.999 2 | 16 | 80 |
15 | 恩诺沙星 | y=1.032×106 x-4.904×104 | 1.00~19.94 | 0.998 2 | 4 | 8 |
16 | 沙拉沙星 | y=4.787×104 x-1.355×103 | 0.97~19.46 | 0.999 8 | 40 | 160 |
17 | 双氟沙星 | y=1.983×105 x+2.240×104 | 1.00~19.91 | 0.999 6 | 8 | 16 |
18 | 莫西沙星 | y=1.959×105 x-1.650×104 | 1.01~20.22 | 0.999 9 | 8 | 16 |
19 | 氟轻松 | y=6.377×106 x-1.382×104 | 1.08~21.64 | 0.996 8 | 42 | 84 |
20 | 曲安奈德 | y=1.672×106 x-6.890×103 | 0.98~19.68 | 0.999 8 | 50 | 100 |
21 | 倍他米松 | y=5.679×105 x-3.872×103 | 0.99~19.88 | 0.999 4 | 20 | 50 |
22 | 地塞米松 | y=3.399×105 x+1.388×104 | 1.00~20.08 | 0.999 5 | 20 | 50 |
23 | 地塞米松醋酸酯 | y=5.360×105 x+2.012×104 | 1.00~19.96 | 0.999 8 | 25 | 100 |
24 | 倍他米松醋酸酯 | y=6.887×105 x+1.382×104 | 1.01~20.26 | 0.999 8 | 25 | 100 |
25 | 倍他米松戊酸酯 | y=4.568×105 x-8.382×103 | 1.01~20.12 | 0.999 9 | 50 | 200 |
26 | 曲安奈德醋酸酯 | y=3.398×105 x-1.223×104 | 1.04~20.71 | 0.999 9 | 50 | 150 |
Tab. 4
Spiked recoveries of 26 compounds"
序号 | 名称 | 回收率/% | RSD/% | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 μg/g | 8 μg/g | 18 μg/g | 2 μg/g | 8 μg/g | 18 μg/g | |||
1 | 氟康唑 | 94.9 | 100.9 | 97.1 | 3.8 | 6.0 | 3.1 | |
2 | 酮康唑 | 95.4 | 94.8 | 93.6 | 4.9 | 3.5 | 4.9 | |
3 | 萘替芬 | 96.3 | 98.4 | 96.9 | 3.5 | 0.8 | 1.5 | |
4 | 联苯苄唑 | 97.1 | 98.6 | 96.5 | 2.7 | 0.9 | 2.0 | |
5 | 克霉唑 | 97.9 | 98.0 | 97.9 | 3.6 | 0.7 | 1.1 | |
6 | 益康唑 | 103.2 | 101.7 | 96.6 | 3.9 | 0.7 | 1.9 | |
7 | 咪康唑 | 97.1 | 101.0 | 102.5 | 2.6 | 0.6 | 1.7 | |
8 | 灰黄霉素 | 94.9 | 99.8 | 99.1 | 4.2 | 0.9 | 2.2 | |
9 | 依诺沙星 | 96.3 | 103.3 | 102.4 | 2.0 | 1.3 | 1.5 | |
10 | 氟罗沙星 | 98.1 | 101.4 | 93.9 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 3.9 | |
11 | 氧氟沙星 | 93.1 | 90.0 | 87.1 | 3.6 | 2.6 | 5.6 | |
12 | 诺氟沙星 | 102.5 | 102.7 | 95.8 | 2.5 | 2.6 | 2.8 | |
13 | 培氟沙星 | 110.1 | 115.2 | 103.1 | 5.7 | 0.6 | 2.9 | |
14 | 环丙沙星 | 106.5 | 106.9 | 101.6 | 3.1 | 1.4 | 1.3 | |
15 | 恩诺沙星 | 99.9 | 103.2 | 103.3 | 2.3 | 1.6 | 2.3 | |
16 | 沙拉沙星 | 107.6 | 110.6 | 95.7 | 3.9 | 1.5 | 2.4 | |
17 | 双氟沙星 | 94.9 | 99.8 | 93.1 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 2.7 | |
18 | 莫西沙星 | 97.7 | 102.9 | 92.7 | 1.7 | 2.0 | 3.8 | |
19 | 氟轻松 | 90.6 | 86.4 | 97.9 | 4.0 | 4.2 | 1.3 | |
20 | 曲安奈德 | 92.8 | 97.9 | 95.7 | 2.5 | 2.2 | 2.5 | |
21 | 倍他米松 | 103.5 | 100.9 | 104.5 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 2.7 | |
22 | 地塞米松 | 102.9 | 99.8 | 98.7 | 0.9 | 1.5 | 1.7 | |
23 | 地塞米松醋酸酯 | 98.8 | 103.9 | 100.3 | 1.5 | 2.2 | 0.6 | |
24 | 倍他米松醋酸酯 | 98.6 | 102.7 | 100.6 | 2.2 | 2.9 | 1.1 | |
25 | 倍他米松戊酸酯 | 97.5 | 104.9 | 99.3 | 2.9 | 3.2 | 0.9 | |
26 | 曲安奈德醋酸酯 | 101.5 | 104.5 | 100.5 | 2.5 | 5.2 | 1.2 |
[1] | Huang Chuanfeng, Zhang Huiliang, Wang Haiyan, et al. Analysis of twenty-six kinds of antibiotics such as fluconazole, minocycline and enoxacin in anti-acne cosmetics purchased online[J]. Flavour Fragrance Cosmetics, 2019 (6): 25-27. |
[2] | Zhan Wei, Tang Xianfa, Yang Sen. Research progress in corticosteroid dependent dermatitis[J]. Chinese Journal of Dermatovenereology of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine, 2017, 16(4): 370-372. |
[3] | Ruan Haolan, Chen Qi, Luo Zhuoya. The situation and harm of glucocorticoid abuse in cosmetic masks[J]. Pharmacy Today, 2018, 28(10): 717-720. |
[4] | Meng Qingyu, Yin Shuai, Li Wenli, et al. Analysis of preservatives used in commercial cosmetic masks[J]. Flavour Fragrance Cosmetics, 2017 (4): 46-48. |
[5] | China Food and Drug Administration. Safety and technical standards for cosmetics (2015)[S]. Beijing: China Food and Drug Administration, 2016. |
[6] | Lei Yi, He Jiawen, Huang Yanting, et al. Simultaneous determination of 12 banned and restricted substances in anti-acne cosmetics by high performance liquid chromatography[J]. Journal of Instrumental Analysis, 2013, 32(3): 326-330. |
[7] | Zhou Jiang, Huang Yanmei, Gong Yuefei, et al. Determination of four prohibited substances in whitening or acne cosmetics by ultra-performance liquid chromatography[J]. Chemical Analysis & Meterage, 2016, 25(2): 52-55. |
[8] | Wu Lingli, Qin Weidong. Separation of Quinolones by capillary electrophoresis[J]. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Natural Science)[J]. 2006, 42(1): 66-69. |
[9] | Cuo Chengfang, Shang Shaoming, Liu Junkang, et al. Online determination of glucocorticoids in cosmetics by large volume sample injection-reduced electric field sweeping and microemulsion electrokinetic chromatography[J]. Journal of Instrumental Analysis, 2016, 35(6): 686-691. |
[10] | Shao mingyuan, Wang Hao, Shi Hailiang, et al. QuEChERS-based liquid chromatography coupled with triple quadrupole mass spectrometry for the determination of eleven antifungal drugs in cosmetics[J]. Chinese Journal of Analysis Laboratory, 2016, 35(4): 430-434. |
[11] | Lu Jian, Xun Zhiqing, Wang Chenxia, et al. Determination of 15 quinolone antibiotics in cosmetics by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry[J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2019, 49(6): 403-409. |
[12] | Dong Yalei, Liu Zhao, Wang Haiyan, et al. Determination of 43 glucocorticoids in infant eczema products by UHPLC-MS/MS[J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2020, 50(12): 885-891. |
[1] | Linling Lu, Hui Lu, Chunyan Min, Yefei Qian. Determination of functional components of Glycyrrhizae, Ginseng and Scutellariae in facial masks by UHPLC-MS/MS [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2024, 54(1): 107-113. |
[2] | Wang Min, Li Mengyue, Li Xiaoyi, Liu Qi, Zhao Hua, Zhao Fengnian. On-site and rapid electrochemical method for chloramphenicol detection in facial masks [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2023, 53(7): 802-807. |
[3] | Ma Liangbo, Sun Yu, Zhu Guifang, Lu Jiayi, Xu Yan, Liu Tao. Determination of 42 glucocorticoids beyond the national standard method in cosmetics by solid phase extraction-liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2023, 53(7): 849-856. |
[4] | Kong Qiuchan, Jiang Jiaxin, Xia Gaohui, Gong Shengzhao. Study on antibacterial activity of antibacterial fiber and its application in mask products [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2023, 53(5): 538-543. |
[5] | Cui Xiuhua,Gao Weitao,Wu Qingmei,Su Zixin,Sun Chongqiu. Effect of gold microneedle combined with Kefumei mask on symptoms, skin physiological function and prognosis of patients with rosacea [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2022, 52(7): 744-749. |
[6] | Xu Xiaohui,Wang Xiaoqiao,Zhao Bo,Du Ruihu,Zhang Hongyan,Shi Xiaofeng. Filtered solid phase extraction-UPLC-MS/MS for determination of 35 glucocorticoids in hair-rearing solutions [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2022, 52(4): 444-450. |
[7] | Zhang Hongyan,Shi Xiaofeng,Wang Xiaoqiao,Liu Xingguo,Liu Yapeng,Li Yun. Study on transdermal absorption and skin irritation of fluorescent whitening agents in facial mask [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2022, 52(3): 322-327. |
[8] | Jia Changping,Zhang Bin,Zhang Shanshan,Zheng Jiaxin,Zheng Mei,Chen Wei. Determination of betamethasone and eight analogues in cosmetics by UPLC-ESI-Q-TOF/MS [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2022, 52(2): 207-213. |
[9] | Tan Huimin,Wang Tao,Zhu Bin,Ling Wenchao,Fan Lanyan. Identification and analysis of Pluralibacter gergoviae in facial masks based on MALDI-TOF MS [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2022, 52(10): 1107-1112. |
[10] | Zhou Zheng,Wu Mengjie,Wang Yi,Lin Wenqiang,Guo Miao,Yang Fan. The EEG study of facial mask act on consumers’ mental relaxation [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2021, 51(7): 662-669. |
[11] | WANG Hong-yue,WANG Ying-chun,JIANG Li,YANG Yan-ge,LIU Ming-chang,WU Ya-jun. Identification of the common cosmeceutical homologous plants in mask powder products based on DNA barcoding [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2021, 51(6): 528-534. |
[12] | YANG Piao-piao,LIU Hong,LI Li-xia. Detection of 76 glucocorticoids in cosmetics by automatic solid-phase extraction and LC/MS/MS [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2021, 51(5): 468-476. |
[13] | Wu Qi,Jin Xin,Yang Xiaoqian,Zhi Hui,Wu Nan,Zhang Hui. Pharmacodynamic study of an anti-photoaging composition and preparation of a gel mask [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2021, 51(12): 1192-1201. |
[14] | Qiao Yasen,Dong Yalei,Huang Chuanfeng,Wang Haiyan,Sun Lei. Simultaneous determination of 63 hormone drugs in facial masks by UHPLC-MS/MS [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2021, 51(12): 1259-1268. |
[15] | GAO Xue-yi,WANG Yu,HE Cong-fen,FENG Chun-bo,CHEN Yuan-yuan,SONG Li-ya. Application of PCA algorithm in the research of facial micro-ecology [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2020, 50(7): 457-463. |
|