China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics ›› 2024, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (1): 114-122.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2097-2806.2024.01.016
• Analytical methods and testing • Previous Articles
Huiduan Long1,Yixiang Lu1,Jianglan Qin2,Keming Zhang1,*()
Received:
2022-12-29
Revised:
2023-12-28
Online:
2024-01-22
Published:
2024-01-26
Contact:
*Tel.: +86-771-5828718, E-mail: 150851877@qq.com.
CLC Number:
Huiduan Long, Yixiang Lu, Jianglan Qin, Keming Zhang. Simultaneous determination of 24 coumarin compounds in cosmetics by high performance liquid chromatography and verification by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry[J].China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2024, 54(1): 114-122.
Tab. 3
Mass spectrometry parameters of 24 coumarin compounds"
序号 | 名称 | 保留时间/min | 母离子(m/z) | 去簇电压/V | 子离子(m/z) | 碰撞电压/V |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 6-羟基-7-甲氧基香豆素 | 6.57 | 193.0 | 80 | 178.1*/132.8 | 29/26 |
2 | 7-羟基-6-甲氧基香豆素 | 6.46 | 193.0 | 90 | 133.0*/150.1 | 23/36 |
3 | 7-羟基香豆素 | 7.12 | 163.0 | 80 | 106.9*/ 90.8 | 29/26 |
4 | 6,7-二甲氧基香豆素 | 8.54 | 207.1 | 80 | 151.1*/163.1 | 28/31 |
5 | 香豆素2 | 8.68 | 147.1 | 60 | 90.9*/102.8 | 28/22 |
6 | 二氢香豆素1 | 11.28 | 149.0 | 120 | 107.0*/ 79.1 | 23/32 |
7 | 羟甲基香豆素 | 8.78 | 176.9 | 100 | 77.1*/105.0 | 48/26 |
8 | 7-甲氧基香豆素1 | 10.40 | 177.1 | 80 | 121.1*/132.9 | 29/24 |
9 | 六氢香豆素1 | 12.46 | 153.0 | 65 | 93.1*/ 77.2 | 18/40 |
10 | 补骨脂素 | 10.91 | 187.1 | 160 | 131.0*/115.1 | 33/29 |
11 | 7-甲基香豆素1 | 11.87 | 161.1 | 80 | 104.9*/ 91.0 | 29/30 |
12 | 6-甲基香豆素 | 12.02 | 161.1 | 80 | 104.9*/ 91.0 | 28/27 |
13 | 异补骨脂素 | 12.30 | 187.1 | 160 | 131.0*/115.1 | 30/29 |
14 | 8-甲氧基骨补脂素 | 11.87 | 217.0 | 90 | 201.9*/174.1 | 27/37 |
15 | 7-甲氧基-5,11,12-三羟基香豆素 | 13.66 | 315.1 | 120 | 161.0*/297.0 | 48/32 |
16 | 5-甲氧基骨补脂素 | 14.49 | 217.0 | 80 | 201.9*/174.1 | 29/37 |
17 | 7-乙氧基-4-甲基香豆素1 | 16.26 | 205.1 | 80 | 177.0*/120.8 | 25/34 |
18 | 醋硝香豆素1 | 17.82 | 354.2 | 100 | 162.9*/295.9 | 22/27 |
19 | 双香豆素1 | 18.86 | 335.1 | -20 | 160.9*/117.0 | -18/-56 |
20 | 苯丙香豆素1 | 19.12 | 281.1 | 100 | 203.2*/174.9 | 24/33 |
21 | 欧前胡素1 | 18.73 | 271.0 | 105 | 203.1*/147.0 | 16/42 |
22 | 三甲沙林 | 19.60 | 229.1 | 120 | 142.0*/173.0 | 30/30 |
23 | 异欧前胡素 | 20.02 | 271.0 | 80 | 203.1*/147.0 | 14/41 |
24 | 4,6-二甲基-8-特丁香豆素1 | 20.29 | 231.0 | 100 | 215.0*/174.8 | 42/27 |
Tab. 4
Regression equations, correlation coefficients, linear range, limits of detection and limits of quantification of 24 coumarin compounds"
序号 | 名称 | 线性范围/(mg/L) | 回归方程 | 相关系数 | LOD/(mg/kg) | LOQ/(mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 6-羟基-7-甲氧基香豆素 | 2~160 | Y=18 799X-5 482 | 0.999 8 | 7 | 21 |
2 | 7-羟基-6-甲氧基香豆素 | 2~160 | Y=18 556X-1 895 | 0.999 9 | 6 | 18 |
3 | 7-羟基香豆素 | 2~160 | Y=31 472X-5 022 | 0.999 9 | 6 | 18 |
4 | 6,7-二甲氧基香豆素 | 3~240 | Y=12 707X+19 892 | 0.999 7 | 9 | 30 |
5 | 香豆素 | 1~80 | Y=29 937X-4 469 | 0.999 9 | 3 | 9 |
6 | 二氢香豆素 | 20~1 600 | Y=19 310X-7 654 | 0.999 7 | 67 | 209 |
7 | 羟甲基香豆素 | 2~160 | Y=30 102X-12 972 | 0.999 8 | 7 | 23 |
8 | 7-甲氧基香豆素 | 2~160 | Y=31 525X-24 107 | 0.999 7 | 7 | 23 |
9 | 六氢香豆素 | 20~1 600 | Y=4 807X-524 | 0.999 7 | 71 | 224 |
10 | 补骨脂素 | 2~160 | Y=27 116X-5 282 | 0.999 9 | 7 | 21 |
11 | 7-甲基香豆素 | 2~160 | Y=37 836X-32 702 | 0.999 8 | 8 | 27 |
12 | 6-甲基香豆素 | 3~240 | Y=19 722X-11 963 | 0.999 8 | 11 | 33 |
13 | 异补骨脂素 | 1~80 | Y=29 500X-586 | 0.999 9 | 3 | 9 |
14 | 8-甲氧基补骨脂素 | 3~240 | Y=34 568X-31 916 | 0.999 7 | 10 | 33 |
15 | 7-甲氧基-5,11,12-三羟基香豆素 | 3~240 | Y=31 655X-12 251 | 0.999 9 | 11 | 33 |
16 | 5-甲氧基补骨脂素 | 1~80 | Y=32 955X-2 520 | 0.999 9 | 3 | 9 |
17 | 7-乙氧基-4-甲基香豆素 | 1~80 | Y=27 002X-514 | 0.999 9 | 3 | 9 |
18 | 醋硝香豆素 | 1~80 | Y=29 121X-1 254 | 0.999 8 | 3 | 8 |
19 | 双香豆素 | 1.5~120 | Y=12 414X-3 461 | 0.999 7 | 5 | 16 |
20 | 苯丙香豆素 | 1~80 | Y=29 348X+2 129 | 0.999 9 | 3 | 8 |
21 | 欧前胡素 | 1~80 | Y=29 343X-149 | 0.999 8 | 3 | 8 |
22 | 三甲沙林 | 1~80 | Y=31 472X-12 188 | 0.999 7 | 3 | 9 |
23 | 异欧前胡素 | 1~80 | Y=27 831X+694 | 0.999 9 | 3 | 9 |
24 | 4,6-二甲基-8-特丁香豆素 | 2~160 | Y=12 145X-2 186 | 0.999 9 | 6 | 19 |
Tab. 5
Results of recovery test and RSD (n = 6) of 24 coumarin compounds"
序号 | 名称 | 添加量/μg | 乳液 | 霜膏 | 水基 | 固态基 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
回收率/ % | RSD/ % | 回收率/ % | RSD/ % | 回收率/ % | RSD/ % | 回收率/ % | RSD/ % | ||||||
1 | 6-羟基-7-甲氧基香豆素 | 21.68 | 97.7 | 1.7 | 103.7 | 1.5 | 104.4 | 1.4 | 98.4 | 2.2 | |||
43.36 | 97.9 | 2.2 | 105.3 | 2.3 | 102.1 | 1.6 | 101.1 | 1.8 | |||||
216.8 | 99.9 | 1.8 | 103.7 | 1.2 | 104.4 | 1.4 | 101.1 | 2.1 | |||||
2 | 7-羟基-6-甲氧基香豆素 | 22.14 | 101.8 | 2.1 | 106.3 | 1.9 | 100.3 | 2.2 | 103.9 | 1.3 | |||
44.28 | 105.6 | 2.0 | 99.4 | 1.9 | 107.4 | 3.0 | 102.3 | 2.3 | |||||
221.4 | 102.6 | 1.8 | 102.1 | 2.8 | 104.3 | 1.6 | 104.8 | 2.2 | |||||
3 | 7-羟基香豆素 | 20.45 | 103.2 | 1.4 | 107.2 | 1.4 | 100.9 | 0.9 | 99.9 | 1.7 | |||
40.90 | 100.4 | 1.2 | 106.8 | 1.9 | 101.8 | 2.1 | 102.4 | 2.4 | |||||
204.5 | 103.1 | 1.1 | 101.6 | 1.4 | 100.9 | 2.0 | 103.9 | 1.1 | |||||
4 | 6,7-二甲氧基香豆素 | 30.60 | 98.5 | 2.7 | 105.6 | 1.1 | 100.7 | 0.9 | 99.9 | 1.7 | |||
61.24 | 100.1 | 1.0 | 105.8 | 1.0 | 105.6 | 1.3 | 97.2 | 2.5 | |||||
306.0 | 96.9 | 2.3 | 101.8 | 1.8 | 100.7 | 0.9 | 101.1 | 2.1 | |||||
5 | 香豆素 | 11.26 | 96.2 | 1.6 | 100.3 | 1.3 | 99.4 | 0.9 | 98.6 | 1.8 | |||
22.52 | 101.6 | 0.8 | 101.8 | 1.9 | 102.6 | 1.2 | 100.4 | 2.2 | |||||
112.6 | 99.7 | 2.1 | 102.7 | 2.0 | 102.9 | 1.1 | 102.2 | 1.6 | |||||
6 | 二氢香豆素 | 229.9 | 97.6 | 2.2 | 102.3 | 2.7 | 99.2 | 2.0 | 98.3 | 1.5 | |||
459.7 | 100.9 | 1.7 | 103.7 | 2.5 | 104.5 | 3.3 | 105.3 | 2.5 | |||||
2 299 | 103.4 | 2.4 | 100.2 | 1.1 | 105.0 | 2.0 | 101.3 | 2.3 | |||||
7 | 羟甲基香豆素 | 27.16 | 101.0 | 1.7 | 103.0 | 2.4 | 103.5 | 2.2 | 101.9 | 1.6 | |||
54.32 | 97.3 | 0.9 | 108.2 | 1.1 | 98.8 | 2.4 | 102.4 | 2.7 | |||||
271.6 | 99.0 | 1.2 | 103.0 | 1.2 | 103.5 | 2.2 | 101.9 | 1.4 | |||||
8 | 7-甲氧基香豆素 | 21.09 | 103.7 | 1.6 | 104.1 | 1.1 | 102.9 | 2.0 | 100.2 | 1.6 | |||
42.18 | 100.4 | 1.9 | 97.6 | 0.9 | 101.4 | 1.7 | 101.7 | 1.9 | |||||
210.9 | 104.8 | 2.2 | 102.3 | 1.7 | 105.3 | 0.9 | 102.0 | 2.1 | |||||
9 | 六氢香豆素 | 217.4 | 102.3 | 2.2 | 102.3 | 2.7 | 99.2 | 2.0 | 98.3 | 1.5 | |||
434.8 | 99.2 | 2.0 | 102.0 | 2.2 | 102.8 | 1.5 | 98.4 | 1.9 | |||||
2 174 | 103.2 | 2.0 | 100.5 | 2.2 | 98.2 | 1.9 | 102.9 | 1.3 | |||||
10 | 补骨脂素 | 22.14 | 107.2 | 1.0 | 102.2 | 1.9 | 100.4 | 1.6 | 105.3 | 0.8 | |||
44.28 | 102.3 | 1.3 | 101.4 | 0.9 | 99.9 | 1.6 | 101.4 | 1.0 | |||||
221.4 | 103.3 | 1.4 | 102.6 | 2.0 | 101.7 | 2.0 | 100.9 | 1.4 | |||||
11 | 7-甲基香豆素 | 23.07 | 104.1 | 2.0 | 103.6 | 1.1 | 104.4 | 1.6 | 102.6 | 2.0 | |||
46.14 | 102.2 | 1.6 | 101.7 | 1.8 | 97.8 | 2.0 | 103.9 | 1.7 | |||||
230.7 | 99.6 | 1.8 | 100.6 | 0.9 | 101.3 | 1.6 | 104.4 | 1.8 | |||||
12 | 6-甲基香豆素 | 31.84 | 101.2 | 1.2 | 100.3 | 1.6 | 101.2 | 1.5 | 100.4 | 0.9 | |||
63.68 | 100.7 | 1.4 | 104.2 | 2.2 | 101.8 | 1.5 | 102.2 | 1.1 | |||||
318.4 | 98.6 | 1.9 | 102.5 | 2.1 | 103.3 | 2.1 | 99.3 | 1.4 | |||||
13 | 异补骨脂素 | 13.34 | 103.4 | 2.3 | 99.5 | 2.4 | 103.9 | 1.9 | 102.5 | 2.0 | |||
26.68 | 100.3 | 1.9 | 104.9 | 1.6 | 103.0 | 2.5 | 104.2 | 2.1 | |||||
133.4 | 101.3 | 2.3 | 98.5 | 1.6 | 103.6 | 1.4 | 101.7 | 2.4 | |||||
14 | 8-甲氧基补骨脂素 | 31.88 | 102.6 | 1.0 | 99.7 | 1.1 | 104.6 | 1.4 | 103.6 | 2.0 | |||
63.76 | 103.4 | 1.4 | 100.4 | 1.0 | 103.2 | 1.3 | 101.8 | 1.3 | |||||
318.8 | 101.8 | 1.6 | 102.6 | 1.9 | 101.8 | 2.6 | 100.5 | 2.4 | |||||
15 | 7-甲氧基-5,11,12-三羟基香豆素 | 32.14 | 104.9 | 1.7 | 101.3 | 1.6 | 98.3 | 1.4 | 106.3 | 1.7 | |||
64.28 | 103.0 | 0.9 | 98.6 | 1.6 | 103.2 | 1.2 | 102.6 | 1.9 | |||||
321.4 | 102.5 | 1.6 | 100.4 | 2.1 | 101.5 | 1.9 | 103.3 | 1.2 | |||||
16 | 5-甲氧基补骨脂素 | 12.84 | 102.9 | 1.7 | 106.0 | 2.5 | 103.2 | 1.7 | 101.2 | 2.0 | |||
25.67 | 97.9 | 1.1 | 105.5 | 1.5 | 102.1 | 1.6 | 103.7 | 3.4 | |||||
128.4 | 99.5 | 1.1 | 103.6 | 2.1 | 103.2 | 1.7 | 100.3 | 1.8 | |||||
17 | 7-乙氧基-4-甲基香豆素 | 11.47 | 102.6 | 1.1 | 96.8 | 2.6 | 102.6 | 1.8 | 102.5 | 2.3 | |||
22.93 | 97.8 | 1.1 | 102.0 | 2.1 | 103.3 | 1.4 | 103.7 | 1.1 | |||||
114.7 | 98.4 | 1.4 | 102.8 | 2.2 | 102.6 | 1.8 | 99.2 | 1.4 | |||||
18 | 醋硝香豆素 | 11.29 | 99.2 | 2.2 | 106.2 | 3.5 | 102.7 | 2.0 | 103.0 | 2.9 | |||
22.58 | 95.6 | 1.2 | 103.0 | 1.0 | 99.3 | 2.2 | 103.0 | 1.5 | |||||
112.9 | 99.0 | 1.8 | 103.5 | 2.5 | 102.7 | 2.0 | 100.2 | 1.8 | |||||
19 | 双香豆素 | 15.48 | 104.3 | 2.4 | 100.3 | 2.1 | 103.3 | 2.1 | 102.5 | 1.5 | |||
30.96 | 103.9 | 3.2 | 103.5 | 1.5 | 102.4 | 1.9 | 100.7 | 2.3 | |||||
154.8 | 95.8 | 1.9 | 101.2 | 2.3 | 104.3 | 2.5 | 105.4 | 2.1 | |||||
20 | 苯丙香豆素 | 10.21 | 103.9 | 2.1 | 106.4 | 2.2 | 102.7 | 2.1 | 101.6 | 2.0 | |||
20.42 | 99.6 | 2.4 | 105.2 | 1.1 | 103.5 | 2.3 | 101.6 | 2.5 | |||||
102.1 | 97.0 | 2.4 | 101.8 | 1.3 | 102.7 | 2.1 | 104.2 | 1.5 | |||||
21 | 欧前胡素 | 10.33 | 99.3 | 3.2 | 99.0 | 2.5 | 98.7 | 2.8 | 101.5 | 2.3 | |||
20.66 | 100.4 | 2.6 | 105.3 | 3.0 | 98.5 | 2.4 | 103.5 | 2.6 | |||||
103.3 | 98.0 | 1.1 | 96.8 | 1.5 | 98.7 | 2.8 | 99.4 | 3.3 | |||||
22 | 三甲沙林 | 8.753 | 102.4 | 2.2 | 107.0 | 0.7 | 102.9 | 2.3 | 103.5 | 2.4 | |||
17.51 | 103.0 | 2.7 | 107.5 | 1.7 | 103.5 | 2.3 | 102.4 | 1.4 | |||||
87.53 | 98.1 | 1.2 | 102.4 | 1.9 | 102.9 | 2.4 | 99.3 | 1.1 | |||||
23 | 异欧前胡素 | 11.63 | 93.8 | 1.7 | 94.4 | 2.3 | 100.0 | 2.4 | 96.4 | 2.6 | |||
23.27 | 97.1 | 2.1 | 93.0 | 1.4 | 98.4 | 2.1 | 95.8 | 2.0 | |||||
116.3 | 94.0 | 1.0 | 100.4 | 1.8 | 103.2 | 1.6 | 97.5 | 2.7 | |||||
24 | 4,6-二甲基-8-特丁香 豆素 | 21.96 | 102.9 | 1.5 | 98.0 | 2.6 | 102.7 | 1.7 | 102.5 | 1.5 | |||
43.92 | 100.8 | 1.2 | 94.8 | 1.9 | 100.4 | 2.5 | 103.3 | 1.3 | |||||
219.6 | 98.4 | 1.7 | 102.3 | 1.3 | 102.7 | 1.7 | 99.8 | 0.9 |
[1] | Ye Chenglian, Chen Jincong, Wu Longhuo, et al. Research progress on anti-inflammatory activity of coumarin[J]. Journal of Modern Medicine & Health, 2022, 38 (23) : 4063-4065, 4069. |
[2] | Zhou Jiming, Yu Chaojing, Hang Yiqing, et al. Study on Angelica dahurica Ⅵ, determination of phototoxicity activity of effective components[J]. China Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 1988, 8 (5) : 220-221. |
[3] | Chen Changqing, Zhong Shan, Lu Bingshan, et al. Phototoxicity of furanocoumarins and preparation of furanocoumarin free citrus oils[J]. Flavour Fragrance Cosmetics, 2008 (6) : 8-10. |
[4] | Zhang Fenglian, Yang Zhexuan, Yang Wenjing, et al. Introduction and consideration of EMA’s reflection paper on risk associated with furocoumarins contained in preparations of Angelica archangelica[J]. Drug Evaluation Research, 2021, 44 (8) : 1644-1652. |
[5] | Zhu Yixin, Li Baoli, Ma Hongsheng, et al. Research progress of Angelica dahurica for extracting effective components, pharmacological action and clinical application[J]. China Medical Herald, 2014, 11 (31) : 159-162, 166. |
[6] | Wang Yang, Lei Yanhua, Cheng Bingchen. Research overview of coumarin compounds in cosmetics[J]. Heilongjiang Medicine Journal, 2013, 26 (6) : 981-983. |
[7] | Ma Qiang, Bai Ye, Wang Chao, et al. Rapid screening of 18 coumarin compounds in cosmetics by ultra performance liquid chromatography-qusdrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry[J]. Journal of Instrumental Analysis, 2014, 33 (3) : 248-255. |
[8] | Meng Xianshuang, Ma Qiang, Yuan Hancheng, et al. Determination of coumarin allergen and its derivatives in cosmetics by HPLC and their verification by HPLC-MS/MS[J]. Journal of Instrumental Analysis, 2016, 35 (7) : 799-804. |
[9] | National Medical Products Adiministration. Safety and technical standards for cosmetics[M]. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House, 2015: 7-94. |
[10] |
Zhu Huibin, Wang Xueping. Determination of 10 coumarin and their derivatives in fragrance compound by high performance liquid chromatography[J]. Journal of Analytical Science, 2019, 35 (4) : 521-524.
doi: 10.2116/analsci.18P329 |
[11] | Zhou Zhiming, Chen Zhanghao, Li Jing, et al. Determination and verification of 18 coumarins in cosmetics by liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry[J]. Flavour Fragrance Cosmetics, 2021 (2) : 53-58, 64. |
[12] | Wang Hongmei, Zhang Yanhui, Li Lingling. Simultaneous determination of 22 coumarins in cosmetics by HPLC and verification by mass ppectrometry[J]. Chinese Journal of Modern Applied Pharmacy, 2023, 40 (1) : 107-111. |
[13] | Xiao Shangjia, Wang Shiping. Determination of 6-methyl coumarin in cosmetics by gas chromatography[J]. Journal of Environment and Health, 2002 (2) : 146-147. |
[14] | Zheng Chenyang, Gu Hua, Yu Xiaofeng, et al. Simultaneous determination of seven coumarin compounds in cosmetics by gas chromatography[J]. Flavour Fragrance Cosmetics, 2016 (4) : 28-32. |
[15] | Wang Lei, Yang Jinqing, Gu Yuxiang. Determination of 7-diethylamino-4-methylcoumarin in cosmetics by high performance liquid chromatography-triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry[J]. Flavour Fragrance Cosmetics, 2018 (4) : 35-39. |
[16] | Zhou Zhiming, Li Jing. Determination of coumarins in cosmetics by high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry[J]. Guangdong Chemical Industry, 2020, 47 (14) : 159-162. |
[17] | Zhao Xiaoya, Lin Yanfei, Hu Xiaozhong, et al. Determination of coumarins in cosmetics with gas chromatography mass spectrometry[J]. Chinese Journal of Analysis Laboratory, 2010, 29 (3) : 76-79. |
[18] | Zheng Shu, Xie Jing, Qin Jian. Determination of eight coumarins in cosmetics by the GC-MS[J]. China Pharmaceuticals, 2022, 31 (17) : 77-80. |
[19] | Yan Mengmeng, Guo Xiangyu, Meng Xianshuang, et al. Determination of five kinds of prohibited coumarin derivatives in cosmetics using ambient ionization coupled with ion mobility spectrometry[J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2017, 47 (9) : 536-540. |
[20] | Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China.Determination of coumarin and its derivatives in cosmetics by high performance liquid chromatography:GB/T 35798—2018 [S]. Beijing: China Quality and Standards Publishing & Media, 2018. |
[21] | Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China.Determination of 8 furocoumarines including 8-methoxypsoralen in cosmetics by high performance liquid chromatography: GB/T 30935—2014 [S]. Beijing: China Quality and Standards Publishing & Media, 2014. |
[22] | Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China.Determination of citral, cinnamyl alcohol, anise alcohol, cinammal and coumarin in cosmetics by gas chromatography method:GB/T 24800.9—2009 [S]. Beijing: China Quality and Standards Publishing & Media, 2009. |
[23] | Zhou Zhiming, Li Jing, Li Haimin. Analysis of the use of plant coumarin in cosmetics[J]. Guangdong Chemical Industry, 2020, 47 (15) : 83-85. |
[1] | Jingxuan Liu, Jianming Jin, Hua Wu. Botanical cosmetic ingredients (VII)Research and development of plant antifungal [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2024, 54(3): 259-266. |
[2] | Wu Bi, Xiaohong Pan, Xiaoqin Tu, Shuai Yin, Hui Sun. Analysis of the mechanism of anti-sensitive skin effect of cosmetic raw material Stephania tetrandra based on network pharmacology [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2024, 54(3): 305-312. |
[3] | Yaoyao Li. Study on the anti-aging and antioxidant effects of isosinensetin [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2024, 54(3): 313-319. |
[4] | Mengran Xu, Hua Zhao. Research progress on the evaluation methods of cosmetic after-sun repair efficacy [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2024, 54(3): 329-336. |
[5] | Liyuan Zhang, Linqi Yan, Qiaoyuan Cheng, Lvye Qi, Rong Wang, Liuqian Huang. Determination of 14 kinds of α-hydroxy acids and hydroxy esters in cosmetics [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2024, 54(3): 353-359. |
[6] | Wei Xu, Po Zou, Changyu Li, Ming Yang, Yan Lu, Huiliang Li. Determination of 36 stimulants in cosmetics by ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2024, 54(3): 360-368. |
[7] | Kangfu Zhou, Yixuan Zhi, Feifei Wang, Yazhuo Shang. New emulsion system and its application in cosmetics (VI)Microemulsion [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2024, 54(2): 139-148. |
[8] | Hongling Zhang, Lin Cheng, Haiyan Wang, Feiya Luo, Huiliang Zhang, Lei Sun. Using DPRA alternative method to evaluate the skin sensitization of 3 coumarins [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2024, 54(2): 156-160. |
[9] | Zhen Xie, Wei Huang, Jinsong Zhang, Shuhuai Chen, Linji Qu, Rong Kuang. Study on biomarkers of corneal injury in the evaluation of eye irritation of cosmetics [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2024, 54(2): 161-167. |
[10] | Xiaohong Pan, Ziqi Gao, Zhen Chen, Shuai Yin, Haiping Huang, Bin Hu. Discussion on the current situation of research and management on the stability of cosmetic products in China [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2024, 54(2): 201-208. |
[11] | Li Lu, Fang Fang, Youlong Feng, Ling Cao. Screening for illegal addition of sulfonamides in cosmetic products using ultra-performance liquid chromatographytriple quadrupoletandem mass spectrometry with precursor ion scanning [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2024, 54(2): 216-223. |
[12] | Ren Wang, Yuanyang Wu, Jia Qiao, Linqi Yan, Cen Chen, Liyuan Zhang. Study on phenoxyethanol content in children’s cosmetics on the mark and preliminary risk assessment [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2024, 54(2): 224-230. |
[13] | Yixiang Lu, Liting Wu, Jimin Jiang, Hailu Chen, Xuan Huang. Determination of tolnaftate and liranaftate in cosmetics by high performance liquid chromatography and verification by high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2024, 54(2): 231-238. |
[14] | Liyuan Zhang, Qiaoyuan Cheng, Cen Chen, Zehua Li, Liuqian Huang, Lvye Qi. Determination of 3 kinds of α-hydroxy acids and their esters in cosmetics by high performance liquid chromatography [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2024, 54(1): 102-106. |
[15] | Linling Lu, Hui Lu, Chunyan Min, Yefei Qian. Determination of functional components of Glycyrrhizae, Ginseng and Scutellariae in facial masks by UHPLC-MS/MS [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2024, 54(1): 107-113. |
|