中国年轻女性油性皮肤分类方法与特点研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.2097-2806.2023.12.008

Abstract

Abstract:

Oily skincare is one of the common problems confronting young Chinese females. Currently, skin type characterization is largely based on self-reports and qualitative assessments by dermatologists. Quantitative classification approach for oily skin totally based on the non-invasive skin measurement devices has not been reported in the literatures. In this study, based on box-plot data and machine learning clustering algorithms for 2000 Chinese female subjects （mean aged 25.90±2.61）, non-invasive, objective, and quantitative classification approach for oily skin were initially established and compared with dermatologists’ empirical results for mutual corroboration. On this basis, this study quantitatively collected data on skin barrier, chromaticity, elasticity, acne and other indicators through a multifunctional probe tester and a facial skin imaging system, analyzed the accompanying characteristics of oily skin and susceptible skin problems, clarified the characteristics of oily skin in young Chinese females, and evaluated the risk level of acne and sensitivity of oily skin, with a view to providing scientific care and guidance for Chinese young females with oily skin groups. The results show that the box-plot classification method based on facial hydro-oil distribution is superior to the other two types of methods. The accompanying characteristics of oily skin are poor barrier, dull complexion, less elasticity, more acne and pores. In addition, the risk of acne-prone skin is significantly higher in oily skin based on odds ratio.

Key words: skin parameters, susceptibility, geographical distribution, odds ratio, oily skincare

CLC Number:

TQ658

Xiaoxiao Yang, Huan Yan, Yating Yin, Fan Yi. A study on the classification approach and characteristics of oily skin in young Chinese females[J].China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2023, 53(12): 1412-1420.

Figures/Tables 9

Fig. 1

Tab. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Tab. 2

Tab. 3

Fig. 5

Tab. 4

References 35

[1]	Niemann C, Horsley V. Development and homeostasis of the sebaceous gland[J]. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol., 2012, 23 (8) : 928-936. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2012.08.010 pmid: 22960253
[2]	Sakuma T H, Maibach H I. Oily skin: an overview[J]. Skin Pharmacol. Physiol., 2012, 25 (5) : 227-235. doi: 10.1159/000338978
[3]	Zheng Y, Liang H, Zhou M, et al. Skin bacterial structure of young females in China: the relationship between skin bacterial structure and facial skin types[J]. Exp. Dermatol., 2021, 30 (10) : 1366-1374. doi: 10.1111/exd.v30.10
[4]	Jang S I, Jung Y, Lee M, et al. Evaluation of changes in skin characteristics due to the poor quality of sleep caused by smartphone usage[J]. J. Cosmet. Dermatol., 2022, 21 (4) : 1656-1665. doi: 10.1111/jocd.v21.4
[5]	Zhao C, Wang X, Mao Y, et al. Variation of biophysical parameters of the skin with age, gender, and lifestyles[J]. J. Cosmet. Dermatol., 2021, 20 (1) : 249-255. doi: 10.1111/jocd.v20.1
[6]	Jang S I, Han J, Lee M, et al. A study of skin characteristics according to humidity during sleep[J]. Skin Res. Technol., 2019, 25 (4) : 456-460. doi: 10.1111/srt.12673 pmid: 30620080
[7]	Kim S, Park J W, Yeon Y, et al. Influence of exposure to summer environments on skin properties[J]. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol., 2019, 33 (11) : 2192-2196. doi: 10.1111/jdv.15745 pmid: 31199529
[8]	Jacobsen E, Billings J K, Frantz R A, et al. Age-related changes in sebaceous wax ester secretion rates in men and women[J]. J. Invest. Dermatol., 1985, 85 (5) : 483-485. pmid: 4056460
[9]	Rawlings A V. Ethnic skin types: are there differences in skin structure and function?[J]. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci., 2006, 28 (2) : 79-93. doi: 10.1111/ics.2006.28.issue-2
[10]	Galzote C, Estanislao R, Suero M O, et al. Characterization of facial skin of various Asian populations through visual and non-invasive instrumental evaluations: influence of age and skincare habits[J]. Skin Res. Technol., 2013, 19 (4) : 454-465. doi: 10.1111/srt.12069 pmid: 23521621
[11]	Zhao C, Wang X, Mao Y, et al. Variation of biophysical parameters of the skin with age, gender, and lifestyles[J]. J. Cosmet. Dermatol., 2021, 20 (1) : 249-255. doi: 10.1111/jocd.v20.1
[12]	Nouveau-Richard S, Zhu W, Li Y H, et al. Oily skin: specific features in Chinese women[J]. Skin Res. Technol., 2007, 13 (1) : 43-48. pmid: 17250531
[13]	Seo J I, Ham H I, Baek J H, et al. An objective skin-type classification based on non-invasive biophysical parameters[J]. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol., 2022, 36 (3) : 444-452. doi: 10.1111/jdv.v36.3
[14]	Du Shuangyu, Wang Hongbin, Li Feng. Identification method of transformer oil temperature abnormal state[J]. Elect. Appl., 2015, 34 (S2) : 859-862.
[15]	Wang Yu, Zhou Yongzhang, Xiao Fan, et al. Theoretical basis of box diagram and its application in earth science research[C]// Abstracted Proceedings of the 8th National Symposium on the Theory of Mineralization and Methods of Finding Minerals. Nanchang: Editorial Department of Acta Mineralogica Sinica, 2017: 752.
[16]	Liang Huixiang, Jing Jianping, Abduzhixiti-Buimaiti, et al. Classification and evaluation of cotton quality in Xinjiang based on cluster analysis and discriminant analysis[J]. Wool Text. Sci. Technol., 2023, 51 (5) : 121-126.
[17]	Jing Liu, Ziyin Qiu, Maozu Guo, et al. An improved algorithm for K-means clustering based on Tukey’s rule and initial centroid optimization[J]. Data Acquis. Process., 2023, 38 (3) : 643-651.
[18]	Mercurio D G, Segura J H, Demets M B, et al. Clinical scoring and instrumental analysis to evaluate skin types[J]. Clin. Exp. Dermatol., 2013, 38 (3) : 302-308. doi: 10.1111/ced.12105 pmid: 23517362
[19]	Tangkijngamvong N, Phaiyarin P, Wanichwecharungruang S, et al. The anti-sebum property of chitosan particles[J]. J. Cosmet. Dermatol., 2020, 19 (8) : 2135-2140. doi: 10.1111/jocd.v19.8
[20]	Theerawattanawit C, Phaiyarin P, Wanichwecharungruang S, et al. The efficacy and safety of chitosan on facial skin sebum[J]. Skin Pharmacol. Physiol., 2022, 35 (1) : 23-30. doi: 10.1159/000517965
[21]	Chen Fan, Yang Jun, Yang Suping, et al. Study on the anti-acne efficacy of hydrolyzed zinc hyaluronate[J]. Dail. Chem. Ind., 2023, 53 (2) : 165-170.
[22]	Jo D J, Shin J Y, Na S J. Evaluation of changes for sebum, skin pore, texture, and redness before and after sleep in oily and nonoily skin[J]. Skin Res. Technol., 2022, 28 (6) : 851-855. doi: 10.1111/srt.13224 pmid: 36308509
[23]	Maia C P, Melo M O, Mercurio D G. Use of advanced imaging techniques for the characterization of oily skin[J]. Front. Physiol., 2019, 10: 254. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00254 pmid: 30971936
[24]	Kim B Y, Choi J W, Park K C, et al. Sebum, acne, skin elasticity, and gender difference-which is the major influencing factor for facial pores?[J]. Skin Res. Technol., 2013, 19 (1) : 45-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2011.00605.x pmid: 22211382
[25]	Hameed A, Akhtar N, Khan H M S, et al. Skin sebum and skin elasticity: Major influencing factors for facial pores[J]. J. Cosmet. Dermatol., 2019, 18 (6) : 1968-1974. doi: 10.1111/jocd.v18.6
[26]	Lee S J, Seok J, Jeong S Y, et al. Facial pores: definition, causes, and treatment options[J]. Dermatol. Surg., 2016, 42 (3) : 277-285. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000657 pmid: 26918966
[27]	Jung Y C, Kim E J, Cho J C, et al. Effect of skin pH for wrinkle formation on Asian: Korean, Vietnamese and Singaporean[J]. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol., 2013, 27 (3) : 328-332. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2012.04660.x pmid: 22830637
[28]	Kim M K, Choi S Y, Byun H J, et al. Comparison of sebum secretion, skin type, pH in humans with and without acne[J]. Arch. Dermatol. Res., 2006, 298 (3) : 113-119. doi: 10.1007/s00403-006-0666-0
[29]	Blaak J, Staib P. The relation of pH and skin cleansing[J]. Curr. Probl. Dermatol., 2018, 54: 132-142. doi: 10.1159/000489527 pmid: 30130782
[30]	Cunliffe W J, Burton J L, Shuster S. The effect of local temperature variations on the sebum excretion rate[J]. Br. J. Dermatol., 1970, 83 (6) : 650-654. doi: 10.1111/bjd.1970.83.issue-6
[31]	He Li, Zheng J, Ma Huiqun, et al. Expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of sensitive skin in China[J]. Chin. J. Dermatol. Venereol., 2017, 31 (1) : 1-4.
[32]	Baumann L. Understanding and treating various skin types: the Baumann skin type indicator[J]. Dermatol. Clin., 2008, 26 (3) : 359-373. doi: 10.1016/j.det.2008.03.007 pmid: 18555952
[33]	Ju Qiang. Chinese acne treatment guidelines (2019 revised edition)[J]. J. Clin. Dermatol., 2019, 48 (9) : 583-588.
[34]	Pochi P E, Shalita A R, Strauss J S, et al. Report of the consensus conference on acne classification. Washington, D.C., March 24 and 25, 1990[J]. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 1991, 24 (3) : 495-500. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(08)80076-x pmid: 1829466
[35]	Yang J, Yang H, Xu A, et al. A review of advancement on influencing factors of acne: an emphasis on environment characteristics[J]. Front. Public Health, 2020, 8: 450. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00450 pmid: 33042936

指标及英文缩写	测试设备及规格形号	测试原理
皮肤水分含量（CM）	Corneometer CM 825	通过CORNEOMETER电容法进行皮肤水分含量的测定
经皮水分散失量（TEWL）	Tewamater TM300	利用扩散原理来测量邻近皮肤表面水分蒸汽压的变化
皮脂分泌量（SM）	Sebumeter SM815	通过光度计测定原理SEBUMETER法进行皮脂分泌量的测定
皮肤酸碱度（pH）	Skin-pH-Meter PH905	通过氢离子（H⁺）半透膜进行酸碱度pH值的测定
黑色素含量（MEXA）血红素含量（ERYTH）	Mexameter MX18	基于RGB光谱吸收原理，通过测定特定波长光的反射量从而进行指标测定
肤色（ITA°）	Colorimeter CL400	基于CIE L^-a^-b^*色度系统测量皮肤颜色的变化
皮肤弹性（R2）	Cutometer dual MPA580	基于吸力/拉伸原理，通过光学系统测定皮肤被吸进探头内深度反映皮肤弹性
色斑（Spots）	—	基于算法提取VISIA-CR（美国Canfield公司）正面交叉偏振光图片的总色斑个数
痤疮（Acne）	—	基于算法提取VISIA-CR（美国Canfield公司）正面交叉偏振光图片的总痤疮个数
毛孔（Pores）	—	基于算法提取VISIA-CR（美国Canfield公司）正面交叉偏振光图片的总毛孔个数
鲍曼问卷分数（BSSQ）	—	鲍曼问卷中敏感相关部分的量表统计数据，BSSQ≥30被认为是敏感性皮肤

皮肤参数	平均值±标准差		P值
皮肤参数	多油人群	总人群	P值
CM	55.16±11.13	59.49±11.80	<0.001
TEWL	15.31± 3.92	14.94± 4.00	0.028
L^*	64.67± 2.93	65.47± 3.14	<0.001
b^*	11.36± 1.80	12.15± 2.20	<0.001
MEXA	170.72±26.30	161.95±27.11	<0.001
ERYTH	311.35±55.09	294.61±56.15	<0.001
R2	0.60± 0.09	0.64± 0.10	<0.001
Pores	76.28±39.20	63.77±36.57	<0.001
Acne	18.51±10.44	16.17±10.67	<0.001
Spots	39.62±30.35	46.21±33.21	<0.001
BSSQ	29.89± 7.52	29.24± 6.41	0.428

皮肤参数	平均值±标准差		P值
皮肤参数	油性皮肤	中性皮肤	P值
CM	61.07± 6.75	65.57± 8.27	<0.001
SM	134.59±36.53	54.00±21.74	<0.001
TEWL	14.67± 3.06	14.17± 3.55	0.002
pH	5.51± 0.49	5.45± 0.49	0.054
MEXA	170.15±24.62	158.81±26.49	<0.001
ERYTH	310.15±57.29	287.77±55.42	<0.001
L^*	63.99± 2.18	64.57± 1.89	0.001
b^*	11.35± 1.80	12.37± 2.33	<0.001
R2	0.61± 0.08	0.66± 0.10	<0.001
Pore	75.45±40.87	58.50±34.25	<0.001
Acne	17.59± 9.63	15.50±10.45	<0.001
Spots	39.15±25.38	47.53±30.78	<0.001
BSSQ	30.03± 7.72	29.29± 6.09	0.573

分类方法	肤质	痘肌	非痘肌	OR （95% CI）	敏感肌	非敏感肌	OR （95% CI）
箱型图	油性	36	298	1.503 （1.011~2.232）^*	150	184	1.223 （0.963~1.553）
	混合性	24	137	2.179 （1.356~3.502）^*	67	94	1.069 （0.769~1.487）
	其他	112	1 393	1	602	903	1
聚类	油性	60	435	1.716 （1.231~2.390）^*	217	278	1.171 （0.954~1.438）
聚类	非油性	112	1 393	1	602	903	1
经验值	油性	51	396	1.524 （1.079~2.153）^*	209	238	1.358 （1.098~1.678）^*
经验值	非油性	121	1 432	1	610	943	1

A study on the classification approach and characteristics of oily skin in young Chinese females

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 9

References 35

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10

[1]	Jingxuan Liu, Jianming Jin, Hua Wu. Botanical cosmetic ingredients （VII）Research and development of plant antifungal [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2024, 54(3): 259-266.
[2]	Cuicui Hu, Daihong Zhou, Xinwan Chen, Jialing Zhong, Canquan Mao. Efficacies and mechanisms of a formula of Chinese medicinal plants （MHC-20） against Streptococcus pyogenes [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2024, 54(3): 282-289.
[3]	Wu Bi, Xiaohong Pan, Xiaoqin Tu, Shuai Yin, Hui Sun. Analysis of the mechanism of anti-sensitive skin effect of cosmetic raw material Stephania tetrandra based on network pharmacology [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2024, 54(3): 305-312.
[4]	Yaoyao Li. Study on the anti-aging and antioxidant effects of isosinensetin [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2024, 54(3): 313-319.
[5]	Wanping Zhang, Qi Peng, Dongmei Zhang, Shilian Zheng, Wen Jiang, Lihao Gu. Mechanism and research progress of chemical leukoderma induced by 4-substituted phenols [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2024, 54(3): 320-328.
[6]	Mengran Xu, Hua Zhao. Research progress on the evaluation methods of cosmetic after-sun repair efficacy [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2024, 54(3): 329-336.
[7]	Na Ta, Mengxin Feng, Jiamin Gao, Fenglan Zhang, Gangli Wang. Supervision and use analysis of sunscreen with potential endocrine disruption risk [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2024, 54(3): 337-343.
[8]	Wenrui Zhou, Jianbiao He, Qian Jiao, Zidi Wang, Qianqian Su, Yan Jia. Research progress of the correlation between sensory evaluation and instrumental analysis of cosmetics in O/W emulsion system [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2024, 54(3): 344-352.
[9]	Liyuan Zhang, Linqi Yan, Qiaoyuan Cheng, Lvye Qi, Rong Wang, Liuqian Huang. Determination of 14 kinds of α-hydroxy acids and hydroxy esters in cosmetics [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2024, 54(3): 353-359.
[10]	Wei Xu, Po Zou, Changyu Li, Ming Yang, Yan Lu, Huiliang Li. Determination of 36 stimulants in cosmetics by ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2024, 54(3): 360-368.
[11]	Kangfu Zhou, Yixuan Zhi, Feifei Wang, Yazhuo Shang. New emulsion system and its application in cosmetics （VI）Microemulsion [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2024, 54(2): 139-148.
[12]	Hongling Zhang, Lin Cheng, Haiyan Wang, Feiya Luo, Huiliang Zhang, Lei Sun. Using DPRA alternative method to evaluate the skin sensitization of 3 coumarins [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2024, 54(2): 156-160.
[13]	Zhen Xie, Wei Huang, Jinsong Zhang, Shuhuai Chen, Linji Qu, Rong Kuang. Study on biomarkers of corneal injury in the evaluation of eye irritation of cosmetics [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2024, 54(2): 161-167.
[14]	Huiyi Li, Yue Zhou, Qian Wu, Lidi Du, Jiaying Xie, Jianhua Tan. Evaluation of cosmetics in melanin inhibition efficacy [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2024, 54(2): 168-174.
[15]	Xinyu Peng, Haiyan Liang, Zixian Wen, Meiting Li, Xin Li, Xiaofeng Qiu. Impact of rheology modifiers on Bag-on-valve spray products [J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2024, 54(2): 181-187.